Using a ring flash and camera settings query

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

sonyalpha
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:41 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Using a ring flash and camera settings query

Post by sonyalpha »

My First techie question on this Forum:

I use a Sony Alpha 300 camera -I have just acquired a used...............Soligor AR 20 T Ring Flash and Light unit; it works well now that I have the correct hot-shoe adaptor for the camera:

Now I am finding problems with the manual camera settings required to get best results; any help and advice offered very welcome.

Thank you

Sonyalpha
Retired but not old in spirit:

Fairly new to photography........keen to learn:

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23603
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

What sorts of problems are you having? Overexposure, underexposure, ghosting, color rendition, ... ?

--Rik

sonyalpha
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:41 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by sonyalpha »

Hi Rik,

Thank you for your interest:

I have a feeling that between the old style connector and my more up to date hot-shoe adaptor the TTL isn't working so I will have to rely on working things out from scratch:I can hardly see many of the shots.....and others are too bright.........this one is the only reasonable shot out of a whole batch.......I tried cranking the ISO up with no joy:

The flash is an old one..everything is functioning except the TTL:

Any ideas:

Thanks:

sonyalpha

Image
Retired but not old in spirit:

Fairly new to photography........keen to learn:

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

If this is the unit I think it is then there is no TTL (through the lens) flash metering. The "auto" flash is accomplished via a small sensor on the front panel of the flash, below the flash tube. If this is the case then it would not be surprising if "auto" exposures were all over the place... since the sensor really needs to "see" the light reflected back from the subject. With a 100 or 200mm macro lens at modest magnification this may work pretty well most of the time, but generally I doubt it would give consistently good exposures on auto. (If this is a different flash then forget everything I'm saying here :wink: )

Since the flash does not communicate with the camera, you need to be sure that the shutter speed set on the camera is no faster than the maximum shutter sych speed. (This could explain the shots you can "hardly see")

If it has manual exposure settings then it's really not too hard to set things up and use manual flash, especially if you have one or two macro lenses that you will regularly use the flash with.

So what lenses will you be using, and does this flash have a panel where you can set it to "manual" or to different manual power levels? (If so, a photo of this panel or the manual controls would be helpful). Once we know this we can provide more assistance.

sonyalpha
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:41 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by sonyalpha »

Image

Hi Charles..thank you for your interest in my enquiry....here is the unit I have................Any advice as to what manual setting will work best with it will be of great help:

I notice, that compared to my home-made reflector/diffuser the ring flash shots appear to be very flat:

My camera is a Sony Alpha 300.......lens a Sony 2.8-100 Macro with all three extension tubes fitted:

Cheers!

sonyalpha
Retired but not old in spirit:

Fairly new to photography........keen to learn:

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23603
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

sonyalpha wrote:the ring flash shots appear to be very flat
This happens because the light comes from all around. You can block a portion of the ring to add some modeling.

--Rik

DaveW
Posts: 1702
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:29 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by DaveW »

As you are using extension tubes I wonder if you are adding the extension factor on for these to get the effective f-number you are working at for calculations, and not just that for the lens alone?

With TTL metering it would normally have allowed for the extra extension, as would TTL flash metering with dedicated flashes since it just meters the light reaching the sensor.

However this obviously does not occur with manual flash, so things need working out using the effective not relative f-number.

DaveW

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Can't tell from the picture what manual settings there might be, but this approach might help...

First, when using this flash always be sure that the shutter speed used is 1/160 or slower (1/125 and slower if you have the sensor image stabilization turned on). You want to work in "M" mode, where you will manually set an aperture and shutter speed.

I don't know what the manual mode settings on the flash are. Sometimes it is simply a basic "manual" where the flash fires at full power every time. Sometimes there are settings that allow you to adjust the manual output... something like 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and such. The basic idea here is that you will run a quick series of tests, at a manual power setting. You should record the magnification used (such as 1:2) and then, while focused on a "medium toned" subject, take a shot at each aperture...2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22. Then look at the pictures and determine which f-stop provided the best exposure. From then on, whenever you are at that magnification and have the flash set for that particular manual power level, that should be the f-stop used. You can make up a little sheet and tape it to the flash unit. Test and make up the chart at whatever magnification markings are convenient to see on your lens. Might be something like 1:10, 1:5, 1:4, and so on. Once you have "calibrated" in this way it really becomes simple to just glance at the chart and set the appropriate aperture once you know what the magnification will be for the picture you are about to take.

Chances are pretty good that you will find that the aperture used remains very close to the same value as you go through the focus range. This is because as you go closer the effective aperture becomes smaller, but it is off-set by the fact that flash is moving closer to the subject.

Such a manual "chart" works remarkably well for most subjects. As you become more experienced you may want to "fudge" a little for white subjects and for very dark subjects. You may find you need to stop down 1/2 to 1 stop more than the chart shows if your subject is white, and you may need to open the aperture about 1/2 larger if your subject is very dark.

Craig Gerard
Posts: 2877
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 1:51 am
Location: Australia

Post by Craig Gerard »

Just another question that may be relevant.

What is the voltage of the Soligor AR 20 T? Does it require a Hot Shoe Safe Sync?

Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"

Cyclops
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

Oh I wish I could find (and afford) a module for that ringflash I won! Its bugging me now!
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

sonyalpha
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:41 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

A Decision and a huge THANK YOU

Post by sonyalpha »

After much experimenting and taking on board all the valuable feedback from you all I sadly decided to give up on the ring flash..I will keep it on hand for when I wish to record a coin or suchlike:

Or...........if someone in the UK would like it please let me know:

Instead I will stick with my home-made crumpled cooking foil reflector that I much improved today with the addition of two layers of opaque plastic folder cover, this acts as a wonderful diffuser:

Here is the result:


Once again any comments very welcome:

sonyalpha


Image
Retired but not old in spirit:

Fairly new to photography........keen to learn:

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic