Olympus vs Nikon CF?

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Pierre,

Nice solution! (Just be sure to watch for vibration problems).

pierre
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: France, Var, Toulon

Post by pierre »

Charles,

Tanks a lot.

There are some advantage using it:

- The microscope body is heavy: no small vibrations (for normal use)
- The translation system is manufactured in order to avoid unwanted moves: in fact, there is no need to align / correct the ratio for the pictures before staking.
- Fine tunning of the translation
- Camera is firmly blocked on the body (strong liaison metal/metal)
- Bright result.
I was very surprised when I found out there is no need for eyepiece in order to have a neat and full frame (no need to crop).

Plus the microscope was quite cheap (Less then 100$ including port)


Thanks for your suggestions: I will work on vibrations
- Camera connection.
- 40D instead of 400D (liveview....)


Pierre

pierre
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: France, Var, Toulon

Post by pierre »

Hum!

Maybe I would have start a new thread....Sorry.


Comming back to the olympus microscope lenses I am in the same expectation is there allready a test done?


Cheers,
Pierre
Regards

Pierre

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic