Pierre,
Nice solution! (Just be sure to watch for vibration problems).
Olympus vs Nikon CF?
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Charles,
Tanks a lot.
There are some advantage using it:
- The microscope body is heavy: no small vibrations (for normal use)
- The translation system is manufactured in order to avoid unwanted moves: in fact, there is no need to align / correct the ratio for the pictures before staking.
- Fine tunning of the translation
- Camera is firmly blocked on the body (strong liaison metal/metal)
- Bright result.
I was very surprised when I found out there is no need for eyepiece in order to have a neat and full frame (no need to crop).
Plus the microscope was quite cheap (Less then 100$ including port)
Thanks for your suggestions: I will work on vibrations
- Camera connection.
- 40D instead of 400D (liveview....)
Pierre
Tanks a lot.
There are some advantage using it:
- The microscope body is heavy: no small vibrations (for normal use)
- The translation system is manufactured in order to avoid unwanted moves: in fact, there is no need to align / correct the ratio for the pictures before staking.
- Fine tunning of the translation
- Camera is firmly blocked on the body (strong liaison metal/metal)
- Bright result.
I was very surprised when I found out there is no need for eyepiece in order to have a neat and full frame (no need to crop).
Plus the microscope was quite cheap (Less then 100$ including port)
Thanks for your suggestions: I will work on vibrations
- Camera connection.
- 40D instead of 400D (liveview....)
Pierre