www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Papillio ulysses II (good eye Craig!)
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Papillio ulysses II (good eye Craig!)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Technical and Studio Photography -- Macro and Close-up
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5805
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:00 pm    Post subject: Papillio ulysses II (good eye Craig!) Reply with quote

I had to smile when I thought of Craig trying to find the location of the second shot I posted yesterday of the Blue Mountain Swallowtail. It can be tricky when all you have to go by is a very close shot.

This is the reason I really try to study these wings in detail with a stereo scope before trying to photograph them. This is a magnificent butterfly... but even even on ones that at first appear a little "dull", there are usually a few locations that are particularly interesting and appealing when looked at closely.

Here is a slightly more "overall", and then an even "tighter" look at the section seen in the second image of yesterdays post.
The blue scales are iridescent, which makes them a little funky to photograph when they are illuminated to show this characteristic.
(As can be seen here: http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5281)

28/4 Schneider Componon reverse mounted on bellows, Nikon D300




Nikon 40/0.50 M Plan ELWD on bellows, Nikon D300

_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cyclops



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Posts: 2968
Location: North East of England

PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great shots Charles. Remind me of multi coloured shingles on the side of a roof.
_________________
Canon 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
lauriek
Site Admin


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2404
Location: South East UK

PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stunning work Charles! So do you think 40x is pushing the limit of what you can do on a bellows? Wink

Cyclops, quite right, I hadn't noticed that before but Lepidopteran wing scales do look a lot like roof tiles of some sort!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5805
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laurie,

The 40X objective is about as far as I wish to actively pursue. (Although if a 60X ELWD or 100X SLWD were to fall into my lap, well... Wink )

My "take" on using microscope objectives like this is that the 10X and 20X are the most useful. They can get you shots that just can't be obtained with more conventional macro optics (mainly in terms of resolution, because of larger effective apertures).

Objectives of power less than 10X seem less necessary, as there are other macro optics that meet (or exceed) the largest effective apertures found on objectives. And with lower magnifications it's not always necessary to work at maximum aperture, so it is possible to make good use of an adjustable aperture at times.

The 40X can be fun, but for me it gets used far less than the 10X and 20X. For one thing, the numerical aperture is not much larger than the 20/0.40 (0.50 on the ELWD, with the SLWD version it is the same). As a result, there is not a huge bump in detail recorded compared to the 20X. When I compare a 40X shot to the same subject taken with 20X (and cropped out to the same area), the 40X does look a little better, but not as much as some might expect. Some subjects are a nightmare with the 40X; others (like certain wing-scale shots or things like the eyes seen here work fine with the 40X and could likely be worked nicely with with even higher magnification objectives.

Well... the temperature has dropped about 25 degrees (F), so it's back to my chores... Crying or Very sad
_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Technical and Studio Photography -- Macro and Close-up All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group