LABOPHOT-2 (focus block)

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: Pau, rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S.

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

elf wrote:Flexures :lol:
... do you mean Openflexure?

Image

-JW:

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

elf wrote:Flexures :lol:
Are you the same elf on Homeshopmachinist? I'm reading about Flexures right now. Never heard of them before.

Thanks,
-JW:

elf
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:10 pm

Post by elf »

Yes :D

For everyone else, I posted a link to Dan Gelbarts excellent video on flexures which seem to be an ideal way to work with sub micron movements.

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

Where did you find your 3D printed model?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK_o7MRmC3s

-JW:

mawyatt
Posts: 2479
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater

Post by mawyatt »

I had completely forgot about Dan's work & video...great stuff.

BTW we used Beryllium flex pivots (same principle as Dan's video discusses) on a Laser controlled (closed loop) tiny (100mm long) moving mirror Michelson Interferrometer (8-12um) on the Remote Sensing Chemical Agent Detector (XM21) in 1980. These pivots had no backlash, no wobble, nor mechanical "noise", and worked beautifully.

Thanks for posting, and bringing back old memories!!

Best,
Research is like a treasure hunt, you don't know where to look or what you'll find!
~Mike

ray_parkhurst
Posts: 2770
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:40 am
Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
Contact:

Post by ray_parkhurst »

These work so well because the systems are essentially springs which are highly constrained in all but the dimension intended for movement. Speaker drivers used as voice coil steppers operate similarly. The voice coil drivers sold for such purposes are not constrained, so a supporting structure is required. Speakers have these structures built-in and optimized for damping factor, so are ideal for this purpose. Most of the damping comes from the acoustics of the enclosure, but stand-alone drivers I've tested seem to be well enough damped without the enclosure to be useful for small-step stacking. I can't tell you how well an enclosure-less driver might work at high magnifications as I have not tested such a system, but up to 20-40x they seem ideal. At higher mags I do expect some sensitivity to room air movement, so there will be a limit to the step size for such a driver. Adding enclosure would greatly reduce this limit.

It's not clear to me what the ultimate limit is for step size in such a constrained system. I'd think it would be limited by the characteristics of the constraining springs. For a driver, there are two springs...the spider, and the surround. Someone much better at mechanics and materials than I might be able to tell you the limits, but I doubt there is any issue down to the nm range.

edited to add: another limit would be the noise level in the driving electronics. Not sure which wins (loses)...mechanical or electrical

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

I have a vintage (so to speak) pair of Yamaha NS-1000M speakers but that'a all I know about Beryllium. I wasn't aware of flexures until elf mentioned it. Dan's video series is excellent as well. Seems like I learn something new every day.
Last edited by Smokedaddy on Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

mawyatt
Posts: 2479
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater

Post by mawyatt »

Smokedaddy wrote:Seems like I learn something new every day.
That's why science is so wonderful, the more you know the more you realize how much you don't :roll:

Best,
Research is like a treasure hunt, you don't know where to look or what you'll find!
~Mike

mawyatt
Posts: 2479
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater

Post by mawyatt »

ray_parkhurst wrote:These work so well because the systems are essentially springs which are highly constrained in all but the dimension intended for movement. Speaker drivers used as voice coil steppers operate similarly. The voice coil drivers sold for such purposes are not constrained, so a supporting structure is required. Speakers have these structures built-in and optimized for damping factor, so are ideal for this purpose. Most of the damping comes from the acoustics of the enclosure, but stand-alone drivers I've tested seem to be well enough damped without the enclosure to be useful for small-step stacking. I can't tell you how well an enclosure-less driver might work at high magnifications as I have not tested such a system, but up to 20-40x they seem ideal. At higher mags I do expect some sensitivity to room air movement, so there will be a limit to the step size for such a driver. Adding enclosure would greatly reduce this limit.

It's not clear to me what the ultimate limit is for step size in such a constrained system. I'd think it would be limited by the characteristics of the constraining springs. For a driver, there are two springs...the spider, and the surround. Someone much better at mechanics and materials than I might be able to tell you the limits, but I doubt there is any issue down to the nm range.

edited to add: another limit would be the noise level in the driving electronics. Not sure which wins (loses)...mechanical or electrical
Ray,

I would think with proper design the electrical noise could be made arbitrarily small since the bandwidth doesn't need to be high. A 1Hz or lower bandwidth seems reasonable for stacking, and a few nanovolt/rt(Hz) noise levels are possible. So environmental noise is probably the bigger noise source, and as you mentioned airflow is a major concern at these levels. I've even had to deal with airflow induced "noise" with ultra-precise electronics!

Best,
Research is like a treasure hunt, you don't know where to look or what you'll find!
~Mike

ray_parkhurst
Posts: 2770
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:40 am
Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
Contact:

Post by ray_parkhurst »

mawyatt wrote:
Ray,

I would think with proper design the electrical noise could be made arbitrarily small since the bandwidth doesn't need to be high. A 1Hz or lower bandwidth seems reasonable for stacking, and a few nanovolt/rt(Hz) noise levels are possible. So environmental noise is probably the bigger noise source, and as you mentioned airflow is a major concern at these levels. I've even had to deal with airflow induced "noise" with ultra-precise electronics!

Best,
Sure, with appropriate filtering the electrical factors could be eliminated. As we know the gain is fairly low in such a system, on order of 1mm/V, or perhaps 3 orders of magnitude below where noise would impact.

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

Sweet, I can't believe this arrived today. I just purchased it Monday ($75) on eBay. Looks to be in excellent condition to me. Now cut cut it down without screwing it up. <g>

Image

-JW:

elf
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:10 pm

Post by elf »

Smokedaddy wrote:Where did you find your 3D printed model?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK_o7MRmC3s

-JW:
I created it in Fusion 360. I'll have to look at the Openflexure a little more closely.

Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

elf wrote: I created it in Fusion 360. I'll have to look at the Openflexure a little more closely.
https://github.com/rwb27/openflexure_microscope

-JW:


Smokedaddy
Posts: 1710
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

I thought this was rather interesting. Voice coil actuators on a X/Y Flexure. Even a range of 10mm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ7IHvOEr2o

-JW:

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic