Is Nikon intending to abstract the esence of focus stacking?

This area is for the discussion of what's new, what's on your mind, and general photographic topics. A place to meet, make comments on this site, and get the latest community news.

Moderators: ChrisR, Chris S., Pau, rjlittlefield

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8522
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

All-Ex wrote:In the bottom line, you cannot do a shooting with infinity corrected microscope objectives using the D850
Can you do it with finite ones?
Other way around: With Infinites it should be possible to an extent, using a camera lens as tube lens, to focus.
Finites use no camera lens, therefore there is no controllable focusing mechanism.
Chris R

All Ex
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:54 am
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

Post by All Ex »

I do agree that the topic I was intending initially was about focus shifting that D850 performs.
On the other hand, I found very exciting, inspiring and very interesting the turn that the conversation took and I followed it with interest.
About Chris`sR respond, you mean to focus the tube in other than the infinity point, if so what would be the function to estimate the steps for that?
And another thing what about the 200mm FL, in the Nikon AF range of lenses?
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8522
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

About Chris`sR respond, you mean to focus the tube in other than the infinity point,
Yes
if so what would be the function to estimate the steps for that?
Though you can work things out easliy based on a Thin lens mode, or a Thick lens model with estimations,
I wouldn't suggest that anything other than a trial.
Step as close as you can, then see what happens.
And another thing what about the 200mm FL, in the Nikon AF range of lenses?
Many many camera lenses have been used as tube lenses. Primes, and zooms at the long end, generally work well enough to use. As I said, it may be the case than only internal-AF-motor lenses will work.

As I said, there are zero options, off the shelf, for Finite objectives.
Chris R

Lou Jost
Posts: 4362
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:03 am
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Post by Lou Jost »

As I said, there are zero options, off the shelf, for Finite objectives.
Actually, some astronomy photographers use an automated extension tube which extends electronically. Very expensive though. I first learned about it somewhere on this forum. But I don't remember under what topic. If I recall correctly, the total change in length of the tube was small.

All Ex
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:54 am
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

Post by All Ex »

Sorry for the delay, I`m engaged in measuring the magnifications in several set ups for future shootings.
CrisR wrote:Though you can work things out easily based on a Thin lens mode, or a Thick lens model with estimations,
I wouldn't suggest that anything other than a trial.
Step as close as you can, then see what happens
It seems to be a pain, let's hope that the outcome will worth all that procedure.
We can make other brands to shoot stills with Nikon, but I don`t know any AF Nikon lens (except for the beast portrait one) with 200mm FL to have an internal motor to do the focus shifting the D850 is capable for.
Except if we follow what Lou Jost said, .but that is another thing.
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video

Lou Jost
Posts: 4362
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:03 am
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Post by Lou Jost »

If I recall correctly the device cost $500-$1000.

mawyatt
Posts: 2469
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater

Post by mawyatt »

Lou Jost wrote:
As I said, there are zero options, off the shelf, for Finite objectives.
Actually, some astronomy photographers use an automated extension tube which extends electronically. Very expensive though. I first learned about it somewhere on this forum. But I don't remember under what topic. If I recall correctly, the total change in length of the tube was small.
Lou,

These are called Crayford Focusers I believe.

Here's the Meade version that I have on my old 10 & 12" Schmidt Cassegrain Telescopes.

https://www.meade.com/meade-zero-image- ... cuser.html

Would be interesting to adapt one of these Crayford type focusers for stacking. If the standard DC motor was replaced with a small stepper, then the standard controllers from Cognisys (Stackshot), Wemacro or MJKZZ could be employed for automated stacking without the use of a focus rail.

Best,

Mike

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 20769
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

mawyatt wrote:These are called Crayford Focusers I believe.
This should be a viable approach.

The best place for such a device will be between objective and tube lens. In that position, the rear lens will remain focused at infinity. The effect of the focusing extension will be to adjust distance between subject and objective, just like the focusing stage of a microscope. Being located in an infinity section of the optics, the added extension will have little effect on image quality, other than increasing or introducing vignetting.

You could also stick the focusing extension between the tube lens and camera. In that position, its major effect will still be to adjust distance between subject and objective. However, by extending the rear lens by the minimum thickness of the focuser, it will also force the rear lens to focus closer than infinity. That will introduce a certain amount of spherical aberration by forcing the objective away from its design point. The same as with AF motor focusing, the added aberrations will be small with low NA objectives, then becoming significant with high NA.

Helicon now makes a device they call Helicon FB Tube. It is an automated extension tube that comes in Canon and Nikon mounts. It's not clear to me whether the device has small enough focus steps for use with microscope objectives on the front, but if it does, that could be a handy device.

--Rik

mawyatt
Posts: 2469
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater

Post by mawyatt »

rjlittlefield wrote:
mawyatt wrote:These are called Crayford Focusers I believe.
This should be a viable approach.

The best place for such a device will be between objective and tube lens. In that position, the rear lens will remain focused at infinity. The effect of the focusing extension will be to adjust distance between subject and objective, just like the focusing stage of a microscope. Being located in an infinity section of the optics, the added extension will have little effect on image quality, other than increasing or introducing vignetting.

You could also stick the focusing extension between the tube lens and camera. In that position, its major effect will still be to adjust distance between subject and objective. However, by extending the rear lens by the minimum thickness of the focuser, it will also force the rear lens to focus closer than infinity. That will introduce a certain amount of spherical aberration by forcing the objective away from its design point. The same as with AF motor focusing, the added aberrations will be small with low NA objectives, then becoming significant with high NA.

Helicon now makes a device they call Helicon FB Tube. It is an automated extension tube that comes in Canon and Nikon mounts. It's not clear to me whether the device has small enough focus steps for use with microscope objectives on the front, but if it does, that could be a handy device.

--Rik
Would be an interesting experiment for sure!! Seems the needed adapters shouldn't be too hard to interface to the objective and tube lens for the objective to tube placement. I recall these Crayford Focusers use a dc motor and pulse the motor. This should work for our use but probably won't have the precise incremental movement desired for stacking. Replacing with a fine step stepper motor and controlling with Stackshot or other controller would be ideal.

Maybe someone will follow up on this and give it a try?

Best,

Mike

Post Reply