Crocus 2017 (added stereo versions)
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Charles - I also think that the stereo-pictures are lovely.rjlittlefield wrote:Lovely stereo!
(The second one may have a little too much separation. It gives great depth, but I perceive the pollen grains as oval, more depth than width, and I doubt that they really are.)
--Rik
Rik - Probably a question for a separate thread. This pictures made me realize that I -when a picture is used in a more scientific context- should inform viewers that there might be (or always is?) a distortion in the Z-axis. In your opinion, how is this best explained/described?
Regards Jörgen
Jörgen Hellberg, my webbsite www.hellberg.photo
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Well, you wrote the software but I am inclined to disagree.rjlittlefield wrote:Lovely stereo!
(The second one may have a little too much separation. It gives great depth, but I perceive the pollen grains as oval, more depth than width, and I doubt that they really are.)
The 50X image is not without it's problems...primarily the "softness" in the sections where the grains overlap the (background) anther. (Very little retouching was done). But as far as the shape and depth of the grains and 3D effect I find it very satisfactory.
Very nice - also the stereo.
Troels
Troels
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums
Visit my Flickr albums