www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Olympus LB Objective Question
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Olympus LB Objective Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Equipment Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
carlh6902



Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Posts: 80
Location: Olathe, KS

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:17 am    Post subject: Olympus LB Objective Question Reply with quote

A question for the Olympus gurus here -

In looking over the long-barrel objectives that were availablefor the BH2 scopes, I see there were (among others) these four types:

1) A - basic achromats - not flat field
2) D - plan acromats - flat field for photomicrography
3) S - super plan achromats - flattest field for the widefield head/oculars
4) E - basic achromats - not flat field, targeted for the educational market

Does anybody know how the E objectives differ from the A objectives, in terms of their optical performance? The mechanical differences are obvious.

Carl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5805
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carl,

Can't answer your question since I have never used them.

You probably already have this brochure, but if not there is some basic info on pages 11 and 19.

www.krebsmicro.com/Olympus_LB.pdf
_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alan Wood



Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 314
Location: Near London, U.K.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 5:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have 5 different Olympus 10x LB objectives, so I have photographed a stage micrometer with each of them, using a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an NFK 2.5x photo eyepiece to get the largest field of view that I can obtain.

Field diaphragm same diameter for all 5 shots. Aperture diaphragm adjusted for the 0.25, 0.30 and 0.40 NA objectives.

Photographed using EOS Utility on Av, exposure compensation +2 stops, each shot focused using Zoom View, resized to 1024 pixels wide in Photoshop Elements, no other adjustments.

I had difficulty focusing my SPlan 10 and the result is not as good as I expected. It is clean, so perhaps I need to buy another one.











Alan Wood
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ChrisR
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 8496
Location: Near London, UK

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At this resolution only the EA really shows its price, perhaps. Splan is strangely brighter Confused ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carlh6902



Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Posts: 80
Location: Olathe, KS

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So it looks to me like the "E" objectives are noticibly less flat than the "A" lenses.

Carl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChrisR
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 8496
Location: Near London, UK

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
flat
Don't confuse flatness of field with field coverage. Though some objectives are flatter (more "plan") than others, many simply don't give sharpness beyond a more limited image circle. See the "field number" in the document Charles points to.
If you're stacking then the field curvature doesn't matter.
I strongly suspect the issue showing here though is lack of sharp field coverage, with the E series. That's certainly the case with some Olympus objectives I have on older student-grade scopes.

There will be "more to it" between the objectives than shows here. They all look much the same centrally. The theoretical resolution ( 0.6 * wavelength/NA) turns out to be of the order of one pixel at the size shown here. Each of the lines on the stage micrometer is only about 5 pixels wide as shown (having been reduced to fit the forum image size). In the original image where there are more pixels to look at, one would hope the more expensive objectives would show better sharpness.

Another matter of course is chromatic aberration. The "apo" objectives should be better within their designed image circle. The cheaper ones will show some CA throughout, generally increasing as you go away from the center. Some of it is "removable" in post processing of the image.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Equipment Discussions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group