A boatload of ? (surface texture on spiracle of cutworm)

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23972
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

A boatload of ? (surface texture on spiracle of cutworm)

Post by rjlittlefield »

I was surprised by the appearance of this subject. Any guesses?

20X onto a 23 mm sensor, slight crop.

Image

Crossed-eye stereo:

Image

Focus stacked at 5 µm step, using Stackshot and Zerene Stacker, using a tripod-based setup similar to HERE.

--Rik

Edited: add ID and shooting info.
Edit #2: correct typo in title
Last edited by rjlittlefield on Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:51 am, edited 2 times in total.

jgknight
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga Australia
Contact:

Post by jgknight »

I have no idea Rik.
John

A picture is worth a thousand words, but it uses up a thousand times the memory.

lauriek
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:57 am
Location: South East UK
Contact:

Post by lauriek »

It looks a lot like pollen in a stamen but as that's what you'd expect that to look like I guess it's something different. Is it a large spiracle?

Planapo
Posts: 1585
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:33 am
Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe

Post by Planapo »

Like Laurie, it reminds me of an anther with pollen grains inside. Sticky pollen can look like this. But then, that "boat" is so tiny ... :-k

Hmm, well, at least it's spring and Rik could be following an old habit and ripping the flowers apart again. :) :wink:
Maybe from and orchid, they can be tiny ...

--Betty

Harold Gough
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
Location: Reading, Berkshire, England

Post by Harold Gough »

I don't know but the concavity in which it resides might be significant.

harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.

SONYNUT
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: Minnesota USA

Post by SONYNUT »

eggs?
..............................................................................
Just shoot it......

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23972
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Yeah, it's quite puzzling. Even a closer crop doesn't seem to help my understanding. I really don't know what the details of this subject are...

Image

--Rik

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23972
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Here is an even closer view, shot this time with Nikon CF Plan 50X 0.55 inf/- EPI ELWD on an ancient Vivitar 200mm f/3.5 tube lens. This may have been sharpened beyond the point of realism, but the enhanced surface texture helps to lock up the 3D impression. Focus-stacked at 2 µm step size using StackShot and Zerene Stacker in a horizontal platform setup similar to HERE.

Crossed-eye stereo.

Image

--Rik

Edit: add shooting info.
Last edited by rjlittlefield on Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23972
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Oh dear me -- I've gotten distracted and forgotten my manners! :oops:
lauriek wrote:Is it a large spiracle?
Just so -- at least for some definition of "large". The spiracle itself measures 0.44 mm in length.

The subject is a cutworm caterpillar, overall length 25 mm. I caught it eating the swelling buds on my grapevine several weeks ago, after noticing that the vine was gradually becoming denuded. I slipped the caterpillar under the microscope, was surprised by the appearance of the spiracles, and stashed it live in the refrigerator until I had some free time to photograph it. I intended to photograph it live, keeping it quiet by chilling, but that didn't work out very well and I ended up accidentally killing the beast by freezing it. The state as photographed in the initial posting here was freshly killed, rinsed in water and then in 99% isopropyl alcohol and briefly air-dried to remove surface moisture. For the 50X version, it has had some chance to dry out a little more.

I really do not know what the white lumps are. I presume that they are surface texture on the two main lips of the spiracle, but it's a mystery to me why they are so different from the surrounding cuticle. Time to study the literature, perhaps. These images have prompted me to read the discussion of spiracles and other respiratory apparatus in "The Insects / Structure and function" by R.F.Chapman. Fascinating stuff!

--Rik

NikonUser
Posts: 2694
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:03 am
Location: southern New Brunswick, Canada

Post by NikonUser »

compare with
THIS IMAGE
NU.
student of entomology
Quote – Holmes on ‘Entomology’
” I suppose you are an entomologist ? “
” Not quite so ambitious as that, sir. I should like to put my eyes on the individual entitled to that name.
No man can be truly called an entomologist,
sir; the subject is too vast for any single human intelligence to grasp.”
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr
The Poet at the Breakfast Table.

Nikon camera, lenses and objectives
Olympus microscope and objectives

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23972
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Further discussion THERE also.

--Rik

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic