Color aberrations
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Color aberrations
First post but I've been lurking here for a couple years. Plenty of you folks seem to have an excellent handle on optics so I thought I'd finally have go at a post here with a question.
Anybody know what causes the RGB rainbow "halos" in bright specular highlights? They can't be seen by eye or through the viewfinder and I've seen the problem with multiple lenses. I suspect it has something to do with the digital bodies? Has anybody seen this when shooting film?
Here's a sample. Note the rainbow spots under the abdomen and hairs in the face of the fly. I shot this natural light with a bit of fill flash.
I know how to avoid this but I'm curious what is going on and why the colors are separating. I suppose this is still considered CA?
Thanks,
Rick
Anybody know what causes the RGB rainbow "halos" in bright specular highlights? They can't be seen by eye or through the viewfinder and I've seen the problem with multiple lenses. I suspect it has something to do with the digital bodies? Has anybody seen this when shooting film?
Here's a sample. Note the rainbow spots under the abdomen and hairs in the face of the fly. I shot this natural light with a bit of fill flash.
I know how to avoid this but I'm curious what is going on and why the colors are separating. I suppose this is still considered CA?
Thanks,
Rick
Rick
- PaulFurman
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:14 pm
- Location: SF, CA, USA
- Contact:
Hard to tell, it could be both. CA can show at the edges of the out of focus highlights just like the edges of any bright part of the image. Here's an example that shows some of that but also clearly some rainbows from diffraction, from the water droplets I guess: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/4 ... 9/sizes/o/
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Rnickl, welcome aboard!
Colored spots are a mess.
The effect that Paul shows comes from dispersion, like what a triangular prism does. The edges of liquid drops can act like prisms, shining little spectra in the general direction of the lens. If one of those spectra happens to span the aperture while the drop is out of focus, then you get the effect of a polygonal highlight with an extended spectrum crossing it. The explanation is that the polygonal highlight for an OOF point is just an image of the aperture. If the aperture is evenly lit, then the highlight is uniform bright. If different parts of the aperture are illuminated by different colors, then corresponding parts of the extended highlight change color too.
It is definitely possible for lenses to introduce color, especially for out-of-focus points. See HERE for an example. Many macro lenses will do this. But I don't think this is a good explanation for what we're seeing with your fly because those colors usually depend on which way an object is OOF, near versus far. With your fly the streaks on the abdomen and leg are all on the same side of focus, and the colors change a lot even for streaks that are close together.
It is also possible for a digital sensor to introduce color, at least in theory. But to get a strong color this way requires both that the illuminated point on the sensor is very small and the anti-aliasing filter is not working very well. I don't think the blue and red OOF streaks on your fly's abdomen and legs can be explained this way either.
And finally it's possible for the bug to actually be shining these colors toward the lens. Any transparent and strongly curved part of the bug can act like a prism. You can get interference colors from transparent layered structures or structures with a strongly repeating fine texture (think diffraction grating).
If I had to guess, I'd say these are probably true colors coming off the fly due to prismatic effects. But that is just a guess.
You mention that you know how to avoid this. Does the trick involve a more diffuse light source? If so, it seems to me that would be an argument in favor of true color coming off the bug. Or is it something else, which might argue for a different cause?
--Rik
Colored spots are a mess.
The effect that Paul shows comes from dispersion, like what a triangular prism does. The edges of liquid drops can act like prisms, shining little spectra in the general direction of the lens. If one of those spectra happens to span the aperture while the drop is out of focus, then you get the effect of a polygonal highlight with an extended spectrum crossing it. The explanation is that the polygonal highlight for an OOF point is just an image of the aperture. If the aperture is evenly lit, then the highlight is uniform bright. If different parts of the aperture are illuminated by different colors, then corresponding parts of the extended highlight change color too.
It is definitely possible for lenses to introduce color, especially for out-of-focus points. See HERE for an example. Many macro lenses will do this. But I don't think this is a good explanation for what we're seeing with your fly because those colors usually depend on which way an object is OOF, near versus far. With your fly the streaks on the abdomen and leg are all on the same side of focus, and the colors change a lot even for streaks that are close together.
It is also possible for a digital sensor to introduce color, at least in theory. But to get a strong color this way requires both that the illuminated point on the sensor is very small and the anti-aliasing filter is not working very well. I don't think the blue and red OOF streaks on your fly's abdomen and legs can be explained this way either.
And finally it's possible for the bug to actually be shining these colors toward the lens. Any transparent and strongly curved part of the bug can act like a prism. You can get interference colors from transparent layered structures or structures with a strongly repeating fine texture (think diffraction grating).
If I had to guess, I'd say these are probably true colors coming off the fly due to prismatic effects. But that is just a guess.
You mention that you know how to avoid this. Does the trick involve a more diffuse light source? If so, it seems to me that would be an argument in favor of true color coming off the bug. Or is it something else, which might argue for a different cause?
--Rik
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Spectral fly
g4lab, thank you for the kind words. I just like to understand how things work. Trying to explain them helps that process.
To explore the issue of these colors a bit more deeply, I hauled out one of my standard dead flies and set up a little test in which I illuminated the same fly with harsh and diffuse illumination, and shot it with the same lens from the same position.
Here is the test setup with diffuse illumination. Remove the tissue paper for harsh illumination from the bare fiber.
Here is a summary of the results.
And a closer view of that interesting bristle...
Exactly what process is making the colors, I'm not sure. But I guess it's evident that there's plenty of opportunity for mischief in these bristly little critters!
It's probably worth noting that even the bare fiber is pretty broad in comparison with direct sunlight. The fiber is 6 mm diameter at 130 mm distance, about 2.6 degrees span. That contrasts with only 0.5 degrees for the sun.
--Rik
More details: Canon T1i camera, Nikon CF N 10X NA 0.30 objective on 180 mm extension, 24 frames at 6-8 microns, Zerene Stacker DMap. The closer view is 70% of actual pixels.
To explore the issue of these colors a bit more deeply, I hauled out one of my standard dead flies and set up a little test in which I illuminated the same fly with harsh and diffuse illumination, and shot it with the same lens from the same position.
Here is the test setup with diffuse illumination. Remove the tissue paper for harsh illumination from the bare fiber.
Here is a summary of the results.
And a closer view of that interesting bristle...
Exactly what process is making the colors, I'm not sure. But I guess it's evident that there's plenty of opportunity for mischief in these bristly little critters!
It's probably worth noting that even the bare fiber is pretty broad in comparison with direct sunlight. The fiber is 6 mm diameter at 130 mm distance, about 2.6 degrees span. That contrasts with only 0.5 degrees for the sun.
--Rik
More details: Canon T1i camera, Nikon CF N 10X NA 0.30 objective on 180 mm extension, 24 frames at 6-8 microns, Zerene Stacker DMap. The closer view is 70% of actual pixels.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Thanks,
In this I found the rainbow effect in the wasp wings, and also some interesting color dots in the body, no colors artifacts in the spider at all.
I'm inclined to believe the wing rainbow is due to this:
f/10 | 1/125s | iso200 (a effective f/stop of about 60, which give about 0,17mm DOF on this magnification)
Canon T1i with Canon MP-E 65mm @ 5x
580 EX II flash bracket mounted with a LumiQuest Mini SoftBox diffuser and silver bounce at right (after the light diffused by the Mini Soft Box).
In this I found the rainbow effect in the wasp wings, and also some interesting color dots in the body, no colors artifacts in the spider at all.
I'm inclined to believe the wing rainbow is due to this:
Have found no explanation for the dots in body, these artifacts were even good to the image but just figuring out what caused them.it's possible for the bug to actually be shining these colors toward the lens. Any transparent and strongly curved part of the bug can act like a prism. You can get interference colors from transparent layered structures or structures with a strongly repeating fine texture (think diffraction grating).
f/10 | 1/125s | iso200 (a effective f/stop of about 60, which give about 0,17mm DOF on this magnification)
Canon T1i with Canon MP-E 65mm @ 5x
580 EX II flash bracket mounted with a LumiQuest Mini SoftBox diffuser and silver bounce at right (after the light diffused by the Mini Soft Box).
- PaulFurman
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:14 pm
- Location: SF, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Spectral fly
Exceptionally clear reply, regarding the photos and the topic, thanks. I've been exploring this phenomenon for a while and now see how much it has to do with lighting, not so much the lens.rjlittlefield wrote:I just like to understand how things work. Trying to explain them helps that process.
It would be useful to have a word to use for describing this phenomenon. 'Rainbow diffraction', or some such. Diffusion has a huge effect on it which I did not quite understand before.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Color in the wings looks definitely interference. Typical appearance, just like oil sheen on water.
I would guess colored spots on body are also interference colors. Bright blue is odd as a pigment, common as interference between layers in the cuticle. Some wasps carry this to the extreme of covering their whole body in it, like HERE.
--Rik
I would guess colored spots on body are also interference colors. Bright blue is odd as a pigment, common as interference between layers in the cuticle. Some wasps carry this to the extreme of covering their whole body in it, like HERE.
--Rik
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Yes, that must be telling us something. But what? Perhaps the bristle structure matters. Maybe these strong colors only come from striated bristles?gmazza wrote:no colors artifacts in the spider at all.
True. I suggest "rainbow flashes", since we don't really know the physics yet.PaulFurman wrote:It would be useful to have a word to use for describing this phenomenon.
In that case, you'll love this animation. Same insect, same lens, same fiber head, everything same except for tissue diffuser and 2 f-stops additional exposure.now see how much it has to do with lighting ... Diffusion has a huge effect on it which I did not quite understand before.
--Rik
I wonder if the fine grooves on the bristles are setting up a diffraction pattern?
Silver coins commonly show a similar color pattern to the wings - related to a thin film of oxidation (silver sulfide) on the surface. The color that is shown is related to the thickness of the film so there is a specific progression of colors that is seen.
Silver coins commonly show a similar color pattern to the wings - related to a thin film of oxidation (silver sulfide) on the surface. The color that is shown is related to the thickness of the film so there is a specific progression of colors that is seen.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
I wondered about that, but it seemed to me (gut feeling) that there aren't enough of them or finely enough spaced.mgoodm3 wrote:I wonder if the fine grooves on the bristles are setting up a diffraction pattern?
When I look closer, that theory seems even less likely.
Here's a whole-head shot.
See the bright green OOF spot at center left?
Here is the bristle causing that, seen much bigger. (These are actual pixels with CF N 10X NA 0.30 160/0.17 on 220 mm extension. There is a bit of focus shift between the two pictures.)
You can see that the top of each striation, individually, is acting like a blue-green mirror.
I suspect that we're seeing interference colors from either layering or much finer striations that don't resolve with this lens. Some SEM shots would tell us, I suppose, but I don't have one handy, nor the specimen prep skills to use it for this problem.
--Rik
I've been out for a few days and it looks like the thread developed a bit in my absence. Also turning out to be more interesting than I though it would be.
Thanks a lot for the sample shots Rik. Much appreciated!
"Some SEM shots would tell us"
SEM? I'm not familiar with the acronym. Can someone clue me in?
Rick
Thanks a lot for the sample shots Rik. Much appreciated!
"Some SEM shots would tell us"
SEM? I'm not familiar with the acronym. Can someone clue me in?
Rick
Rick