Tiger Bee Fly - Xenox tigrinus

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Tiger Bee Fly - Xenox tigrinus

Post by AndrewC »

Another Cape Cod souvenir ...

One of these images has a fault - clue is the size of the specimen.

Image

Image

Image

To get the proboscis extended, I hooked a bent pin over it and left it hanging overnight !

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23626
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Tiger Bee Fly - Xenox tigrinus

Post by rjlittlefield »

AndrewC wrote:One of these images has a fault - clue is the size of the specimen.
OK, I give up. I can see some halo in #2, especially around the wingtip at left of image. But I can't get my eye on anything else. What is the size of this specimen, anyway?

--Rik

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Getting on for 35mm from nose to trailing edge - too big for my lowest mag lens (reversed 80mm) on my bench to get in one shot. I shot two stacks (front half and back half) and then threw them into Autopano Pro. It did a pretty god job but there is a little alignment fault visible half way along the leading edge of the lower wing. Still I was quite impressed with it.
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23626
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Got it. The glitch is quite subtle. I didn't even think to consider a stitch.

Was #2 shot the same way, or did you figure out how to squeeze it into one frame?

If stitched, then I'd say you got off lucky with respect to parallax error, given how deep that specimen is.

--Rik

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

#2 just squeezed in - that's why it's an oblique angle !

APP seems quite accomodating with badly shot pano's, but I was quite surprised how well it came out. I'd love to put together a telecentric rig but don't don't have the time / pieces just now. I do have a Nikon 85mm PC lens for which I'm building a stage.
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

I do have a Nikon 85mm PC lens
Congrats on your lottery win :lol:

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

ChrisR wrote:
I do have a Nikon 85mm PC lens
Congrats on your lottery win :lol:
Had it for years - back from the days when bankers where trusted and engineers got bonuses .....
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

Harold Gough
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
Location: Reading, Berkshire, England

Post by Harold Gough »

Excellent shots. Your white backgrounds are really effective.

Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Harold Gough wrote:Excellent shots. Your white backgrounds are really effective.

Harold
Thanks - the background (this month) is a slightly off white mottled "art letter paper", the kind you see racks and racks of in art shops for writing expensive letters on !
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

Harold Gough
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
Location: Reading, Berkshire, England

Post by Harold Gough »

Andrew,

I'm not sure whether it was to you that I said it before but these people are the leading users of images with white backgrounds:

http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/

Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic