Bug's face

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

lothman
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Stuttgart/Germany

Bug's face

Post by lothman »

today a Canon 3,5/20mm macro lens arrived :D :D :D

Lothman

Image

augusthouse
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:39 am
Location: New South Wales Australia

Post by augusthouse »

Ooops!

Image exceeds the forum 800 x 600px limit. Could you resize?

It's good to see a Canon 3,5/20mm in action :D

Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"

lothman
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Stuttgart/Germany

Post by lothman »

augusthouse wrote:Ooops!

Image exceeds the forum 800 x 600px limit. Could you resize?

Craig
I thought for external linked images that doesn't matter. Could you see the 1200 pix photo?

Hmh how ever here is a 800pix version
Image

augusthouse
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:39 am
Location: New South Wales Australia

Post by augusthouse »

Hi Lothman,

Yes, the 1200px version is viewable. The 800 x 600px limit is for the benefit of viewers who do not have fast internet connections.

It is possible to include a link to the larger version in your post; but 800 x 600px is the nominated, maximum forum image dimension limit.

Larger version here


Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23604
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

augusthouse wrote:The 800 x 600px limit is for the benefit of viewers who do not have fast internet connections.
Monitor size is the main issue regarding pixel counts.

Several years ago we had a limit of 600 x 600 pixels, then we increased it to the present 800 x 800 pixels as larger monitors like 1280 x 1024 became common.

Images of size 800 x 800 will display in their entirety on almost everybody's monitors. Images that are much larger will either not fit at all or require awkward scrolling on commonly used monitors.

When even larger monitors become common, we'll increase the limits again.

It might also make sense to change the limit from square 800x800 pixels to something a bit larger in the horizontal. The catch there is that horizontal image size interacts with the layout of forum pages. I'm not sure exactly how much wiggle room there is.

--Rik

Cyclops
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

Fabulous image there!
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

Bruce Williams
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Northamptonshire, England
Contact:

Post by Bruce Williams »

Great job with your new lens!

Weevils are one of my favourite macro subjects - they've just got so much character - particularly at this sort of magnification. Lighting is just about perfect and really brings out that wonderful elephant-like "skin" texture.

From a purely selfish point of view I'm glad you managed to sneak one in at 1200x862 :D .

Bruce:)

sagarmatha
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:20 am
Location: Sweden

Post by sagarmatha »

A new revelation for me. Never thought that Curculionidae were hairy!
Life is short - follow your interests
web galleries: http://www.staffanmalmberg.se

Panasonic FZ50
Olympus MCON40, Raynox: 150, 250, MSN-202

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic