I wanted to thank everyone who pointed out these amazing 20x planapo objectives from the gene sequencers. The extra thick cover glass correction might be annoying for regular usage, but for imaging inclusions just under the surface in a gem they are very handy.
This is a neat metallic inclusion in a golden beryl crystal from Madagascar, probably hematite or ilmenite or both mixed. The inclusion is just under 1/5 of a mm across.
There is some finnickeyness to using it and I need to get it put on a more suitable tube lens than my Leica Z16, but I am happy with results so far.
Metallic inclusion in beryl
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
No cover slip, just through the polished top of the beryl. The objective seems surprisingly versatile--features on the actual surface look bad, especially highlights, but once you get a bit under it performs quite nicely, and stays good deeper into the stone than I expected too. I am getting bad edge performance but I am blaming my janky setup for that at the moment. It won't be much use for most gem inclusions, but stones like this with lots of very small inclusions throughout should be perfect for it.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23608
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
Whoops, I had two objectives coming in and I got them mixed up. I just realized this was taken on a normal 0.17 corrected Nikon 20x planapo objective. Weirdly they are also being sold for 100 bucks? I understand the unusual gene sequencer ones, but this could be used on a normal scope. Updates to come when the other objective comes in.
I may try that with a cover slip. The surface flatness was quite poor on this beryl, and I was surprised it was not more of an issue.
I may try that with a cover slip. The surface flatness was quite poor on this beryl, and I was surprised it was not more of an issue.
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
OK, the thick cover glass one came in today. I didn't bust out the oil and coverglass yet--it's definitely a bit more finicky to use but still workable--for some reason lighting in particular seemed a bit harder, though I am not sure why. Between the two I think I prefer the 0.17 corrected one, but they're both amazing for 100 bucks I think.
Here are a few test shots--I have an awful lot to learn about photo editing and lighting, these are kind of grainy to put it nicely.
A negative crystal in that same yellow beryl. This is a little trapped bit of the hydrothermal fluid the beryl grew from--these would start out pretty round but over time the surrounding crystal develops flat crystal faces on the inside of the cavity. Often these mimic the crystal shape but these are a lot messier.
Negative crystals again, this time in amethyst. These also don't have a nice quartz-like shape, instead showing a more baroque form.
This is an inclusion in a different beryl, flat skeletal hematite/ilmenite inclusions along with a more three-dimensional of something or other.
Overall I'd say I have a lot to learn about using this but I'm really enjoying it.
Here are a few test shots--I have an awful lot to learn about photo editing and lighting, these are kind of grainy to put it nicely.
A negative crystal in that same yellow beryl. This is a little trapped bit of the hydrothermal fluid the beryl grew from--these would start out pretty round but over time the surrounding crystal develops flat crystal faces on the inside of the cavity. Often these mimic the crystal shape but these are a lot messier.
Negative crystals again, this time in amethyst. These also don't have a nice quartz-like shape, instead showing a more baroque form.
This is an inclusion in a different beryl, flat skeletal hematite/ilmenite inclusions along with a more three-dimensional of something or other.
Overall I'd say I have a lot to learn about using this but I'm really enjoying it.