Water Mite
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Water Mite
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, DF, HF B
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, POL, HF B
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, FLUO-C6.1, HF B
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, FLUO-C4, HF B
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, POL+DF, HF B
Water Mite by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Pitt-Addington Marsh, 4x*2, POL+LP, HF B+C
Very nice Waldo!
https://www.instagram.com/micromundusphotography
https://www.flickr.com/photos/micromundus
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UdYN ... YH_litDZjA
Olympus BX51 | Olympus CX23 | Olympus SZ4045 | Zeiss EVO LS 10
https://www.flickr.com/photos/micromundus
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UdYN ... YH_litDZjA
Olympus BX51 | Olympus CX23 | Olympus SZ4045 | Zeiss EVO LS 10
-
- Posts: 5090
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm
Very beautiful images, thank you for sharing, Waldo!
I like the pol+DF very much and would like to try something similar.
I noticed that pol+DF looks very different than DF or pol alone. Other than the obvious illumination difference, what else contributed to the different looks, if any?
I am guessing those images were taken with the same individual? And are the 3 images (pol+DF, DF, pol) stacks (of approximately how many frames)?
Thank you again.
I like the pol+DF very much and would like to try something similar.
I noticed that pol+DF looks very different than DF or pol alone. Other than the obvious illumination difference, what else contributed to the different looks, if any?
I am guessing those images were taken with the same individual? And are the 3 images (pol+DF, DF, pol) stacks (of approximately how many frames)?
Thank you again.
Thankszzffnn wrote:Very beautiful images, thank you for sharing, Waldo!
DF helps cut glare, so it does imbue the photo with a very different look. I assume since DF alters the light rays' path from the condenser, the interaction with the polarizer is slightly different?zzffnn wrote:I noticed that pol+DF looks very different than DF or pol alone. Other than the obvious illumination difference, what else contributed to the different looks, if any?
All were from the same individual, and all were stacked. Between 50 and 70 photos in each stack.zzffnn wrote:I am guessing those images were taken with the same individual? And are the 3 images (pol+DF, DF, pol) stacks (of approximately how many frames)?