rocking diatoms
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
rocking diatoms
Thanks to Mike Tuell, I have finally tried Zerene. Amazing program. I went after a few diatoms with the Leitz 90x apo Pv and Heine condenser, and created a few rocking gifs. The Pv objectives have the phase ring at higher NA than the 160mm Floutar objectives which was helpful. Now I'm hoping to get new life out of my 40x Apo Pv 0.95
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact:
Easy to see the shape, nicely done!
Best regards
Jörgen Hellberg
Best regards
Jörgen Hellberg
Jörgen Hellberg, my webbsite www.hellberg.photo
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Very nice!
Lou, I take the middle one to be every other wedge is forward/backward, so 3 wedges in front, 3 behind. The floating purple blobs in the middle could be some sort of imaging artifact, or they could really be physical blobs inside the specimen, perhaps being distorted by a rippled surface in front of them.
nanometer, what does direct observation tell you about the floating purple blobs?
--Rik
Lou, I take the middle one to be every other wedge is forward/backward, so 3 wedges in front, 3 behind. The floating purple blobs in the middle could be some sort of imaging artifact, or they could really be physical blobs inside the specimen, perhaps being distorted by a rippled surface in front of them.
nanometer, what does direct observation tell you about the floating purple blobs?
--Rik
Thanks for looking guys. Rik, I would say that central region is more like your latter description rather than some imaging artifact. That's a funny one to look at while rocking for me. Sometimes, I see every other 3 high and then the next time, I see the highs and lows reversed. Sometimes I see two adjacent ones both high, and then it goes away.
I'm interested enough to do some more of this! It's amazing to see how well rocking gives you information compared to just a simple one-view stack. The latter can look like a bit of a mess, but then it all makes sense in rocking. Can't say enough great stuff about Zerene. When my trial period ends, I'll be buying the license.
I'm interested enough to do some more of this! It's amazing to see how well rocking gives you information compared to just a simple one-view stack. The latter can look like a bit of a mess, but then it all makes sense in rocking. Can't say enough great stuff about Zerene. When my trial period ends, I'll be buying the license.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Lou, the actual surface relief is not as much as these images make it appear to be. But yes, those diatoms have a definite up/down/up/down structure to their shell. See http://www.nhm.ac.uk/content/dam/nhmwww ... column.jpg (at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/our-wo ... earch.html) for an SEM image of a similar (not identical!) structure.
nanometer, have you tried these in stereo? I did a little trial with images 4 apart in your sequence, and for me it worked well.
--Rik
nanometer, have you tried these in stereo? I did a little trial with images 4 apart in your sequence, and for me it worked well.
--Rik
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
There are lots of interesting ways for shape-from-motion to go weird.nanometer wrote:Sometimes, I see every other 3 high and then the next time, I see the highs and lows reversed. Sometimes I see two adjacent ones both high, and then it goes away.
With some effort, I can consciously shift between sharp patterns in front versus fuzzy patterns in front. That's OK, but then sometimes I get it one way on the left and the other way on the right, and then the apparent motion becomes a flexing/folding across the almost vertical line. First time it happened, I wondered "Say what?!"
None of those things happen to me with stereo. And of course stereo has the advantage that it does not require an electronic display.
But I agree that under a lot of circumstances, rocking works better. When I present to an audience, I always show the rocking form, usually implemented by forward/backward keystrokes in PowerPoint.
--Rik
Rik,
Just for you, here's a stereo of a diatom very similar to the one in the article you linked above. This is DF with the 40x .95 APO. Not the cleanest, but the stereo image turned out nice--even the little glass tubes sticking out. I tried 40x phase, but the tubes didn't show up very well. I do see what you mean. The stereo image is just cleaner and there is no ambiguity as to what is high and what is low.
Just for you, here's a stereo of a diatom very similar to the one in the article you linked above. This is DF with the 40x .95 APO. Not the cleanest, but the stereo image turned out nice--even the little glass tubes sticking out. I tried 40x phase, but the tubes didn't show up very well. I do see what you mean. The stereo image is just cleaner and there is no ambiguity as to what is high and what is low.