Grasshopper portrait

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Beatsy
Posts: 2131
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Grasshopper portrait

Post by Beatsy »

A few composition errors and other minor flaws, but this came out 'tolerably' all the same - IMO of course. Roughly 150 images in the stack, taken with 5x Mitty on a 135mm tube lens for 3.375x on FF sensor. Slight edge crop so final FoV is a 7mm square.
Image

JH
Posts: 1307
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:46 am
Location: Vallentuna, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by JH »

I realy like the light - controlled and professional.
Regards Jörgen
Jörgen Hellberg, my webbsite www.hellberg.photo

Troels
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:06 am
Location: Denmark, Engesvang
Contact:

Post by Troels »

Very well done -
but more important for me: It's really so funny!
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums

Harald
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 10:33 am
Location: Steinberg, Norway
Contact:

Post by Harald »

Hi there Beatsy,
I think this came out just great. Nice light and details.
The flaws youre talking about is minor, IMO, next time :D

Very well done, thanks for sharing
Kind Regards
Harald

Lier Fotoklubb / NSFF
AFIAP / CPS
BGF / GMV
http://www.500px.com/blender11

mawyatt
Posts: 2497
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida

Post by mawyatt »

Steve,

Beautiful image of an ugly critter :D

Neat how you can "look around" the left antenna!!

Best,

Mike

Beatsy
Posts: 2131
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

Thanks for the generous comments all. Here's another view of the same critter. Just a quick stack, dmap, no retouching. Yes, I'm test stacking again - trying to figure out of there's such a thing as "too much diffusion" - which in itself is a waypoint on the way to (hopefully) re-introducing some directional light for nicer shadowing around raised details and enhancement of surface contours.

I've always wanted to light insects the same as I would for "human portraits" but it's not that straight-forward. I could be on a road to nowhere. Tests show that the point where shadows appear (removing light from certain directions) is also at or very near the point where specular highlights return. Yuck! But I've not exhausted all avenues - there could be a "perfect balance" to be had, I just haven't found it yet...
Image

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23603
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

With directional illumination, have you considered using cross-polarization to tame the specular reflections?

--Rik

Beatsy
Posts: 2131
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

rjlittlefield wrote:With directional illumination, have you considered using cross-polarization to tame the specular reflections?

--Rik
An avenue I've yet to explore properly - but it's on the list.

Beatsy
Posts: 2131
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

Just one to finish the thought. Slightly more directional light from the right side (diffused with half a ping pong ball) and some fill bounced in from the left and front. Some specular reflections, but acceptable levels IMO.

Not sure I like it. Looks completely different to the first one in terms of surface colouring but shows a bit more surface contouring. Still think I prefer the first though. Hmmm...

Image

Troels
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:06 am
Location: Denmark, Engesvang
Contact:

Post by Troels »

For artistic impression I prefer the first portrait.
As a precise and beautiful desription of the shape and relief of the face I prefer the last portrait.

Thanks for giving us both!
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums

Sumguy01
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Ketchikan Alaska USA

Post by Sumguy01 »

:smt038 Very nice.
Thanks for sharing.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic