www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Is Nikon intending to abstract the esence of focus stacking?
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Is Nikon intending to abstract the esence of focus stacking?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum and Community Announcements
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
All Ex



Joined: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 197
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:08 am    Post subject: Is Nikon intending to abstract the esence of focus stacking? Reply with quote

As I heard, d850 is going to have internal capabilities of focus stacking, what will they be and how far will they reach?
Do you believe that these rumors ( angry photographer says that they are published in China) are something to scare us?
With its 46 MP resolution, if it will be able to process NEF (RAW) files the results will be astonishing.
Alright to perform the stacking with our gear, even with a d850, but the internal trick is something out of the official game.
Our struggle will look something like David v Goliath.
What do you think on that?


_________________
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lou Jost



Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 1513
Location: Ecuador

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That revolution has already happened, and it makes things wonderfully easy when conditions are right. Olympus does this now, and to some extent tethering application can at least take the stack automatically with other camera brands.

These techniques are currently limited in their user interfaces, and won't be a substitute for third-party stacking software anytime soon. What they ARE good for is generating a low-m stack almost instantly in camera by focusing ring instead of rail, and that is usually amazingly nice. But for things that require a microscope objective, old-fashioned rail movement will still be the best choice.
_________________
Lou Jost
www.ecomingafoundation.wordpress.com
www.loujost.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lou Jost



Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 1513
Location: Ecuador

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Much more important--Will this Nikon camera get silent shutter/mirror lockup? I'm ready to epoxy my Nikon mirrors up. That still leaves the darned shutters clanking away though.
_________________
Lou Jost
www.ecomingafoundation.wordpress.com
www.loujost.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mawyatt



Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 711

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 46MP sensor will be based upon or very similar to the Sony sensor I would think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mawyatt



Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 711

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Historically Nikon hasn't been stellar in the software areas, and few new camera features have been introduce by them lately. They seem to shine in the camera fundamentals and IQ, rather than features. So I wouldn't expect something involving image stacking to be anything really outstanding, but certainly hope I'm wrong Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
All Ex



Joined: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 197
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that waiting for it to go up in the market with the features it`ll provide, we can`t yet tell what will happen and what will be the method it`ll use.
I too believe that the old traditional means we use will have always better results.
After all, we invest so many thinking and things on that.
_________________
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
All Ex



Joined: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 197
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A closer look in d850 sows that the camera looks like an, other thun alse, interesting situation for our comunity.
As soon as we will modify acordingly our workflow, intresting, if not astonihing, things can hapen.
Among others I have to specify:

  1. Electronic suter speed
  2. Max nomber of photos: 300 photos
  3. Focus distance interval could be customized (10 steps) THIS ISN`T SO CLEAR
  4. Shutter release could be customized (0 to 30 sec)
  5. Continuous shooting around 5 fps, in that mode.

Together with the other things it ofers , I don`t mean the pointless gismos,
I belieave it is ruther a killing machine.
_________________
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lou Jost



Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 1513
Location: Ecuador

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again, Olympus currently matches or beats it in all those specifications. 1000 images per stack, for example.

But the "electronic shutter" is very interesting. Sometimes Nikon has used that phrase to mean that the timing is electronically controlled, but still uses the mechanical shutter. Is this a true Silent Shutter (fully electronic, no mechanical front or back curtain, no mirror flapping? If so, I would buy it someday... if and when my finances allowed it.
_________________
Lou Jost
www.ecomingafoundation.wordpress.com
www.loujost.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
All Ex



Joined: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 197
Location: Greece Thessaloniki

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2017 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So far from the things I read, it seems to be a truly electronic one, as I read of no mechanical movement inside there.
For the moment it is way out of my financial capabilities. But depending on the estimations and how it could offer in the struggle of better stacking, I may consider it as one of my final acts in the field (if there is such a thing)
I very appreciate Olympus but I can only afford to get involved with one brand.
_________________
All--Ex
My YouTube initial video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum and Community Announcements All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group