Hi, I seen a few posts on Flickr regarding people stepping down their last shot in a set for stacking to gain a smoother transition to OOF, When working with such a fine area of focus like a plan apo are there any real noticeable benefits to stepping down?
Here is the iris adapter for the Mitz or BD objective
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/200619040662? ... 1423.l2648
Can anyone with this adapter or similar show two single shots of its effect on the dof.
Thanks Gary
Who steps down?
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
Gary,
Is this what you mean? (My circumstances were a particular need rather than planned).
This was one of my very first stacking attempts:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 2048#82048
Harold
Is this what you mean? (My circumstances were a particular need rather than planned).
This was one of my very first stacking attempts:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 2048#82048
Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Who steps down?
Just to avoid potential confusion, the eBay ad is only for the Mitutoyo to M42 adapter. The picture shows the adapter mounted on a diaphragm which is available as a separate item from the same seller.geetee50 wrote:...
Here is the iris adapter for the Mitz or BD objective
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/200619040662? ... 1423.l2648
...
--ES
Thanks Harold the question relates to 5x and above, Enricosavazzi the sample link was to show the item pictured but thanks for pointing this out, the item in the picture is designed to hold a powerful objective but is it designed to work with one?
Example questions based on Mitutoyo plan apo's
1:
We are shooting at say 5x mag and stepping down the last shot to improve a softer transition to oof, if using an NA of 0.14 we will be at f:3.5 so in theory I can see this working, but if our depth of focus is only 14.0μm is stepping down 2 stops going to improve the transition?
2:
We are now shooting at say 10x mag, with a NA of 0.28 we will be at f:1.8 and our depth of focus is now only 3.5μm is stepping down 2 stops going to improve any transition?
Example questions based on Mitutoyo plan apo's
1:
We are shooting at say 5x mag and stepping down the last shot to improve a softer transition to oof, if using an NA of 0.14 we will be at f:3.5 so in theory I can see this working, but if our depth of focus is only 14.0μm is stepping down 2 stops going to improve the transition?
2:
We are now shooting at say 10x mag, with a NA of 0.28 we will be at f:1.8 and our depth of focus is now only 3.5μm is stepping down 2 stops going to improve any transition?
-
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
- Craig Gerard
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 1:51 am
- Location: Australia
Gary,
There may be some information in this thread relevant to your enquiry.
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... php?t=9321
Craig
There may be some information in this thread relevant to your enquiry.
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... php?t=9321
Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"
Re: Who steps down?
I normally step down for the last shot in my 3D subjects, for flat subjects I do not normally do itgeetee50 wrote:Hi, I seen a few posts on Flickr regarding people stepping down their last shot in a set for stacking to gain a smoother transition to OOF, When working with such a fine area of focus like a plan apo are there any real noticeable benefits to stepping down?
Je, je; I designed that adapter! ;-) I was fed up of trying to find the right one from dissasembled enlarger lenses and seeing jinfinance had Iris for sale I asked him to make a M42 case for itHere is the iris adapter for the Mitz or BD objective
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/200619040662? ... 1423.l2648
Can anyone with this adapter or similar show two single shots of its effect on the dof.
Thanks Gary
This is the original post were I anounced it, on the second page there is a test
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... is&start=0
Regards
Javier
Superb little iris Javier i think it would be worth the few pounds of investment, works with great effect on 5x. If using with a 10x objective how many shots do you step down to get best effect, i see John Hallmens test showed best results with 4 stopped down IMO. In Craigs link http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... php?t=9321
I've seen that link many moons ago craig, thanks for posting, funny how we forget. I'll put it in a favorites folder this time.
I've seen that link many moons ago craig, thanks for posting, funny how we forget. I'll put it in a favorites folder this time.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23937
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
I think the info you're looking for can be seen HERE, top left versus top right picture. Ignore all the in-focus stuff and just look at the out-of-focus background.geetee50 wrote:Can anyone with this adapter or similar show two single shots of its effect on the dof.
To my eye, the major effect is not the additional ~15 microns of good focus that you get by stopping down.We are now shooting at say 10x mag, with a NA of 0.28 we will be at f:1.8 and our depth of focus is now only 3.5μm is stepping down 2 stops going to improve any transition?
Instead, it is the appearance of far background, where things are horribly out of focus. In those areas, the added aperture will reduce the blur radius by a factor of 2X at 2 stops and 4X at 4 stops.
That much reduction in blur can make the difference between a completely unrecognizable background and one that's at least suggestive although still very blurred.
--Rik
Yes I see that one thanks Rik, Makes sense and without seeing it for real i didn't think any blur could be improved with such a fine depth of focus.
thanks guys.
I was thinking there was just a gradual blur from sharp to unrecognisable with a iris rather than the hard transition without but the effect of a suggestive shape gives this piece of equipment a place in my box.That much reduction in blur can make the difference between a completely unrecognisable background and one that's at least suggestive although still very blurred.
thanks guys.