RFID chip from "Alien 9662" label

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 24568
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

RFID chip from "Alien 9662" label

Post by rjlittlefield »

Let's start with the visually interesting image -- crossed-eye stereo pair of a decapsulation attempt gone horribly wrong:

Image

Following is what the chip looks like when the cleaning goes well.

This beast is 0.40 mm x 0.45 mm in size. It is from one of the labels sold on eBay at Alien 9662 3''x1'' UHF 6C 915Mhz RFID Wet Inlay Tag Label. That said, the labels that I received look slightly different, for example the "AZ-9662" is missing, and I cannot match the chip features with any diagrams I can find in Alien datasheets. There is some identifier included in the chip design, looks like "HSL3S120SVB1", but I cannot find that by searching. So I dunno -- I suspect the label is just a work-alike, but maybe it really is by Alien.

Image

This chip has none of the deep 3D structures that I found on RFID chips that I looked at earlier, for example HERE, photo panels 4 and 5.

So for visual interest, I played around with the lighting so as to create some of the interesting diffraction colors.

Image

Colors like are shown above only appear when the chip is illuminated with fairly hard illumination and is tipped slightly so that direct reflections can enter the objective.. (Note that the bright "gold" areas in the pretty-colors rendition appear as pure black in the other image, because they're basically just mirrors.) The colors are also best when the 20X NA 0.42 objective is stopped down a bit. The combination of hard lighting and narrow aperture makes nice colors, but it wreaks havoc with imaging the actual structure of the chips. Following is the same section of chip, seen on the left in its pretty-colors rendering and on the right in its boring but accurate setup using highly diffused illumination and face-on perpendicular to the objective.

Image

I really need to emphasize that most of the fine "details" seen in the pretty-colors version are actually stacking artifacts that are caused by apparent subject movement, due to utilized-aperture effects caused by the off-axis direct reflections. Following is an animation showing 6 consecutive images with a focus step of 1.0 micron.

Image

Finally, here is the setup for shooting the pretty-colors version, together with one source frame from the stack. I suggest not trying to make sense of the dark parts, because the shadow cast by the objective and the dark left side of the frame have no direct relationship to each other. What's happening is that the entire field seen by the objective is illuminated, but the direct reflections are entering only one side of the objective where they become especially vulnerable to vignetting from the adjustable aperture positioned above the objective. The dark left side of the frame is an off-center vignette caused by interaction between the on-center added aperture and the very oblique light that was able to enter the objective.

Image

All shot with Mitutoyo 20X NA 0.42 on Raynox DCR-150, using Canon R7 camera. Regular illumination is with 3 flashes diffused through the coating of an LED tube that fits a fluorescent fixture. All are focus-stacked at 1.0 micron. Stereo pair at +-4 degrees (8 degrees total separation). Decapsulation by heat treatment, 10 minutes on a red-hot electric coil, sandwiched between two stainless steel washers. Final cleaning by ultrasound in water with a bit of detergent, before mounting on glass slide using diluted Elmer's Clear washable PVA glue. I'm pretty sure that the fragmented chip is the only one that I tried to clean first by chemical means, an overnight soak in "Goof Off Pro Strength" adhesive remover. That strongly discolored the solution, but did not free the chip. I moved on to using heat, adding two more chips that had not gone through the Goof Off, and treating the set for only 7 minutes. That produced two chips with some black stuff still on them, and the one chip that was clean but fragmented. I cannot be sure what happened, but the coincidence makes me suspicious.

--Rik

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6291
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Re: RFID chip from "Alien 9662" label

Post by Pau »

I like very much the contrast between the damaged and the good zone of the chip in the stereo, of course the technical aspects are very interesting.
Pau

J_Rogers
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 2:29 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: RFID chip from "Alien 9662" label

Post by J_Rogers »

NXP is a Dutch semiconductor manufacturer that make a pretty well known RFID chip by the name - UCODE HSL (High frequency Smart Label.) Most IC's will list the version number, either directly in the product code, or separately with the date. So the "B1" that follows the "V" in number on the IC is likely the version of the chip. That's about the extent of my knowledge on the subject.

I really enjoyed the first stereo pair you posted! Some stereo images I struggle to see but that one for whatever reason clicked in my brain.

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 24568
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: RFID chip from "Alien 9662" label

Post by rjlittlefield »

J_Rogers wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 6:26 pm
NXP is a Dutch semiconductor manufacturer that make a pretty well known RFID chip by the name - UCODE HSL (High frequency Smart Label.) Most IC's will list the version number, either directly in the product code, or separately with the date. So the "B1" that follows the "V" in number on the IC is likely the version of the chip.
Bingo!

I reshot another sample of the chip at higher resolution, 40X NA 0.80 instead of 20X NA 0.42.

Here is the ID block, actual pixels from Canon R7:

Image

So indeed it's NXP, not Alien.

In this picture we can also see that I misread the ID in the other picture. It should be HSL3S1206VB1. With that correction, Google search does find one document containing that string. It's a version improvement document, https://www.nxp.com/pcn/202301029F01 , which explains that
On UCODE 9 a behavior was identified which only occurs under special conditions and only in use cases where the flags S2/S3/SL are selected. That behavior may impact the detection of items in the application.
...
Identification of Affected Products
UCODE 9 BD (Bade Diced) • Die Inscription (on top metal): HSL3S1206VB1 will change to HSL3S1206VB2
I strongly suspect that "Bade Diced" is a typo for "Blade Diced", noting that the document also refers to "Plasma Diced" and Google search finds "Bade diced" in only two documents: this one from NXP and a newspaper article whose summary talks about "HIT PA BADE DICED PEARS LACIIOY BEAN SPROUTS".

See https://www.nxp.com/products/rfid-nfc/u ... 3S1206FUD2 for some further information about this line of RFID products.

There's one other oddity about this particular order from eBay. When I ordered from https://www.ebay.com/itm/185632545192 , the page showed that the item was priced in AUD and shipped from "greater China" (as I recall) with no restrictions. Today, the page shows "Located in: Shenzhen, China" and "Does not ship to United States." Clicking on Details produces a much longer list of 113 places that it does not ship to, in alphabetical order including "..., Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United States, ...". Ironically, the package that I received came with a Customs label showing that it shipped from...Tuvalu.

Here's the shipping label, along with my slide carrying five decapsulated chips.

Image

I had no idea where Tuvalu was, so I looked it up. It's a small atoll about half way between Hawaii and Australia. Total population 11,900 (estimated 2021 per Wikipedia).

I do not understand global logistics.
I really enjoyed the first stereo pair you posted! Some stereo images I struggle to see but that one for whatever reason clicked in my brain.
Great! I took care to adjust the depth so that the broad flat surface lies in the plane of the monitor, with all the broken stuff behind that. Perhaps that placement, plus all the fine detail on the flat surface, is what made it click.

--Rik

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic