Lygus
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Re: Lygus
Outdated camera + possibly inadequate objective + broken tube lens = excellent results in good hands!
It's generally accepted that Zeiss infinite objectives (for Axios) need corrections done at the tube lens.
What kind of 10X Zeiss was it?
Did you make lateral CA corrections?
It's generally accepted that Zeiss infinite objectives (for Axios) need corrections done at the tube lens.
What kind of 10X Zeiss was it?
Did you make lateral CA corrections?
Pau
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
Re: Lygus
My guess is one from the primostar line which are non-compensating (olympus clones made by Motic).
Re: Lygus
It is a Zeiss Jena Planachromat + 10x/0.20 ∞/-A according to the writing on the side. No CA removal. Actually I just got the Zeiss stereo microscope with the 10x, 40x, 50x and 100x objectives and he threw in an Olympus camera mount for the trinocular port for $100 Canadian. The 40x, 50x and 100x have spring noses. I probably paid too much (winky eye).
Oh, the 30D, yup, outdated dinosaur but a little better than the original Canon Rebel, my other 1.6 crop camera.
Last edited by AlP on Fri Apr 15, 2022 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Lygus
I have no clue, no name plate on microscope. German plates on back, made in GDR. I gather then it is a "stereo" mono via mirrors for the eye pieces? I just wanted the 10x objective. Are these CF 250's good/bad? Thanx for your opinion.
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:26 am
Re: Lygus
Ah, nice. Cf250s have a fairly good reputation in general (though they are thinly used) and are fully internally corrected.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23625
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Lygus
If you see the same image through both eyepieces, then it's just "binocular". ("Trinocular" since you have the camera port.)
"Stereo" implies two different images that convey depth.
--Rik