Assorted flower stacks

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

jgknight
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga Australia
Contact:

Assorted flower stacks

Post by jgknight »

It was a cold wet day here in Wagga Wagga and what better way to spend some time doing some stacking. These flowers come out of my garden at home.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
John

A picture is worth a thousand words, but it uses up a thousand times the memory.

lauriek
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:57 am
Location: South East UK
Contact:

Post by lauriek »

Lovely set as usual John! :)

sonyalpha
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:41 am
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by sonyalpha »

A truly superb set John:

# 1 and # 4 are my favourites..........the first for colour and composition and the second for interest..............it looks as if those graceful stamens are wearing granny's comfy carpet slippers:

sonyalpha
Retired but not old in spirit:

Fairly new to photography........keen to learn:

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23626
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

John, you're making Zerene Stacker look really good here! (Most appreciated, of course. :wink: )

I notice in the last image that there is barely visible contouring in the background, especially on the right side.

I suspect these contours are due to slight differences in exposure from frame to frame. This is fairly common when using flash.

On the other hand, they might be due to Zerene's brightness correction being led astray by other differences between frames.

In either case, you might try changing the setting of Options > Preferences > Alignment > Brightness to see which way gives the better result.

Lovely images -- beautifully "simple"and simply beautiful!

--Rik

jgknight
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga Australia
Contact:

Post by jgknight »

Thank you Laurie and SA for your comments and yes SA they do look a bit like granny's comfy carpet slippers. javascript:emoticon(':D') javascript:emoticon(':lol:')
rjlittlefield wrote:John, you're making Zerene Stacker look really good here! (Most appreciated, of course. :wink: )
I notice in the last image that there is barely visible contouring in the background, especially on the right side.
I suspect these contours are due to slight differences in exposure from frame to frame. This is fairly common when using flash.
On the other hand, they might be due to Zerene's brightness correction being led astray by other differences between frames.
In either case, you might try changing the setting of Options > Preferences > Alignment > Brightness to see which way gives the better result.
Lovely images -- beautifully "simple"and simply beautiful! --Rik
:lol: :lol: :D

Thanks for that info Rik. I will investigate further. I know I do tend to get going with the flash and sometimes I am a bit too fast between recycling so that could be something I need to look into further.

That may not be the problem though. With this last shot, I had a pale yellow background which came out grey so I used some artistic license and changed it to a brighter yellow. I also have a bokeh filter in PS which I sometimes use to cover up some of the dust marks on my sensor. I notice if I don't have the bokeh setting just right, it can cause the contouring you see. I cannot remember if I used bokeh on this one or not. I don't think I did. This is why I will check out the settings and play with them.

As for me making ZS look good - it is the other way around. ZS is making me look good. It is such a great program and I rave about it to anyone who will listen. javascript:emoticon(':lol:')

I have not had much success with tiny insects yet. Maybe if I can find a Raynox at the right price I might do better.
This is about as good as I can do at the moment.
Image
John

A picture is worth a thousand words, but it uses up a thousand times the memory.

Joaquim F.
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:06 pm
Location: Tarragona, Spain
Contact:

Post by Joaquim F. »

Very nice images, specially the first is beautiful!

Cheers

jgknight
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga Australia
Contact:

Post by jgknight »

Thanks Joaquim. I would love to aspire to your level of quality.
John

A picture is worth a thousand words, but it uses up a thousand times the memory.

PaulFurman
Posts: 595
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: SF, CA, USA
Contact:

Post by PaulFurman »

Well done John, these are difficult subjects. How many frames? Stopped down a lot?

jgknight
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga Australia
Contact:

Post by jgknight »

PaulFurman wrote:Well done John, these are difficult subjects. How many frames? Stopped down a lot?
Paul, all these were taken at f11 of f8 on my Canon 30D with 100mm Macro lens. Stacked frames between 50 and 25, the exact number of images appear below my signature on each photo.

The lighting was about as simple as you can get..... Built in flash with a diffuser on the front of the lens made from a kitchen cutting mat.

Image
John

A picture is worth a thousand words, but it uses up a thousand times the memory.

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6072
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

John,

Lovely flash diffuser, i use one very similar (not very expensive :D)

...and of course lovely pictures
Pau

morfa
Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:14 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by morfa »

Beautiful flower stacks John!

I like #4 in particular – great sense of depth and lovely clarity!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic