handheld focus stack - Woodlouse

Images of undisturbed subjects in their natural environment. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

iain
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:43 am

handheld focus stack - Woodlouse

Post by iain »

Hi

Here's a wee woodlouse I found hiding under a log

Image

Still not really insect weather in NE Scotland, but getting there slowly...

Many thanks for looking

Iain

Troels
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:06 am
Location: Denmark, Engesvang
Contact:

Post by Troels »

A very nice and informative picture of an animal in its natural habitat. I like it.
It looks very much like an Oniscus asellus.
I suppose the light is artificial though it looks very natural?
How many shots did you need?
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums

iain
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:43 am

Post by iain »

Troels wrote:A very nice and informative picture of an animal in its natural habitat. I like it.
It looks very much like an Oniscus asellus.
I suppose the light is artificial though it looks very natural?
How many shots did you need?
Thanks, yes I like to take shots of beasts in their natural surroundings. This is natural light, I find flash can be quite a cumbersome thing to deal with for macro work, so I generally get the depth of field simply by stacking. This is a stack of 40 shots.

Troels
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:06 am
Location: Denmark, Engesvang
Contact:

Post by Troels »

40 handheld shots in the field for stacking.
That really deserves respect. Must take some practise.
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

Well done. I'm a bit surprised it's as many as that - I'd guess it's sharp a fair bit bigger than shown here?

For me it's much better to have the subject itself sharp all over like this than have to "allow" for a shot to be a "hand held/single/uncropped" frame.

On the other hand, I'd prefer to see the foreground less out of focus. ;) Terminal frame at f/32, perhaps ?
Chris R

iain
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:43 am

Post by iain »

ChrisR wrote:Well done. I'm a bit surprised it's as many as that - I'd guess it's sharp a fair bit bigger than shown here?

For me it's much better to have the subject itself sharp all over like this than have to "allow" for a shot to be a "hand held/single/uncropped" frame.

On the other hand, I'd prefer to see the foreground less out of focus. ;) Terminal frame at f/32, perhaps ?
Thanks Chris - the focus at either end is something I'm hoping to work on this season - but with shot's like this I'm already down to maybe 1/80 - 1/100 at f2.8, so increasing the aperture significantly might be a problem. A work in progress...

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic