Hi
Here's a wee woodlouse I found hiding under a log
Still not really insect weather in NE Scotland, but getting there slowly...
Many thanks for looking
Iain
handheld focus stack - Woodlouse
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
A very nice and informative picture of an animal in its natural habitat. I like it.
It looks very much like an Oniscus asellus.
I suppose the light is artificial though it looks very natural?
How many shots did you need?
It looks very much like an Oniscus asellus.
I suppose the light is artificial though it looks very natural?
How many shots did you need?
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums
Visit my Flickr albums
Thanks, yes I like to take shots of beasts in their natural surroundings. This is natural light, I find flash can be quite a cumbersome thing to deal with for macro work, so I generally get the depth of field simply by stacking. This is a stack of 40 shots.Troels wrote:A very nice and informative picture of an animal in its natural habitat. I like it.
It looks very much like an Oniscus asellus.
I suppose the light is artificial though it looks very natural?
How many shots did you need?
40 handheld shots in the field for stacking.
That really deserves respect. Must take some practise.
That really deserves respect. Must take some practise.
Troels Holm, biologist (retired), environmentalist, amateur photographer.
Visit my Flickr albums
Visit my Flickr albums
Well done. I'm a bit surprised it's as many as that - I'd guess it's sharp a fair bit bigger than shown here?
For me it's much better to have the subject itself sharp all over like this than have to "allow" for a shot to be a "hand held/single/uncropped" frame.
On the other hand, I'd prefer to see the foreground less out of focus. Terminal frame at f/32, perhaps ?
For me it's much better to have the subject itself sharp all over like this than have to "allow" for a shot to be a "hand held/single/uncropped" frame.
On the other hand, I'd prefer to see the foreground less out of focus. Terminal frame at f/32, perhaps ?
Chris R
Thanks Chris - the focus at either end is something I'm hoping to work on this season - but with shot's like this I'm already down to maybe 1/80 - 1/100 at f2.8, so increasing the aperture significantly might be a problem. A work in progress...ChrisR wrote:Well done. I'm a bit surprised it's as many as that - I'd guess it's sharp a fair bit bigger than shown here?
For me it's much better to have the subject itself sharp all over like this than have to "allow" for a shot to be a "hand held/single/uncropped" frame.
On the other hand, I'd prefer to see the foreground less out of focus. Terminal frame at f/32, perhaps ?