DIY specimen holder
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
There are also spherical magnets. (Found up to 2", search for "sphere" not "ball" for larger ones).
If the croc clip is suitably magnetic, and has an adequate socket, then it would just slide around with no further parts.
Not for rhinocerous beetles, perhaps.
If the croc clip is suitably magnetic, and has an adequate socket, then it would just slide around with no further parts.
Not for rhinocerous beetles, perhaps.
Last edited by ChrisR on Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Edward Ruden
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:24 am
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
- Contact:
One complication with this is that a steel pin (with or without an attached magnet) seated to a spherical permanent magnet will be attracted to the fixed magnetic pole of the sphere. This will limit stable seating to places near the pole only, where a significant downward component of force will allow friction to hold it in place. A steel ball magnetized by a magnetic base does not have this problem because the magnetic field lines freely flow from the base to the pin, creating an attractive force toward the center of the sphere (or thereabouts) at all locations.ChrisR wrote:There are also spherical magnets.
Last edited by Edward Ruden on Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
I passed a charity shop which had an exectutve toy on show. Small black magnetic balls. Playing with just two, they showed no such anisotropy. In other words they stuck together wherever they were put together.will be attracted to the fixed magnetic pole of the sphere
(It occurred to me that a mass of these balls would be quite useful for propping up randomly shaped small items for photography. The balls stay wherever they're squished to.)
- Edward Ruden
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:24 am
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
- Contact:
That's not quite the same thing as a countersunk magnetic disk on a magnetized sphere. A second sphere is free to rotate so as to be antiparallel to the first sphere's polarization. If you hold the two spheres between thumb and forefinger so as to prevent them from rotating, do they still stick to each other regardless of relative position?ChrisR wrote:I passed a charity shop which had an exectutve toy on show. Small black magnetic balls. Playing with just two, they showed no such anisotropy. In other words they stuck together wherever they were put together
The ball bearing on a magnetic base with a countersunk steel pin is on my to-do list. The list is quite long, though, so it'll be a while before I try.
Last edited by Edward Ruden on Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Edward Ruden
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:24 am
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
- Contact:
That's interesting. Those magnetic spheres are not as simple as they appear. I can think of only two possible explanations. The first is that each ball contains a magnetic monopole: one north, the other south. A quick check of the last few years' Nobel Prizes in Physics rules that out; the inventor would have won. The other is that holding the balls does not prevent an internal magnet from rotating. There may be a smaller spherical magnet inside a cavity filled with oil, say. You can test the latter hypothesis by sticking one ball atop the other (thereby aligning and locking their internal magnets in place), and approaching the pair from below with a weaker magnet, pole up. If it is attracted to the balls, turning it upside down so the other pole is up should cause it to repel. However, if you separate the two balls and repeat, the small magnet should only be attracted.ChrisR wrote:Yes.If you hold the two spheres between thumb and forefinger so as to prevent them from rotating, do they still stick to each other regardless of relative position?
Last edited by Edward Ruden on Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
So what would be really nice is a magnetic metal spherical cap with height significantly less than the sphere radius, and maybe even truncated so the radius of the flat plane defining the cap is less than the sphere radius (imagine just the end off an apple core ?) being held on an annular magnet. Subject is then held on a pin above the centre.
This gives you a nice goniometric stage free to move in any axis.
So far this has defeated me. I did try making a mould and filling it with resin loaded with iron filings but there wasn't enough iron content.
Also tried with a plastic sphere with a metal ball bearing rolling on the inside to couple to the supporting magnet but that also wasn't strong enough.
I've been watching out for some sort of steel sphere I could try and cut down to size and then fill with resin or plasticine (though the potential for self harm when trying to cut a metal sphere on a power saw is high) but haven't found anything yet. The original sphere needs to about 10cm in diameter.
I did make a "gravity mount" using this concept with a section out of a plastic sphere but it was just not heavy = strong enough.
I'm sure someone will probably make a nice sketch showing what I mean but I leave that as an exercise for the reader
This gives you a nice goniometric stage free to move in any axis.
So far this has defeated me. I did try making a mould and filling it with resin loaded with iron filings but there wasn't enough iron content.
Also tried with a plastic sphere with a metal ball bearing rolling on the inside to couple to the supporting magnet but that also wasn't strong enough.
I've been watching out for some sort of steel sphere I could try and cut down to size and then fill with resin or plasticine (though the potential for self harm when trying to cut a metal sphere on a power saw is high) but haven't found anything yet. The original sphere needs to about 10cm in diameter.
I did make a "gravity mount" using this concept with a section out of a plastic sphere but it was just not heavy = strong enough.
I'm sure someone will probably make a nice sketch showing what I mean but I leave that as an exercise for the reader
rgds, Andrew
"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes
"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes
My extreme-macro.co.uk site, a learning site. Your comments and input there would be gratefully appreciated.
It might be ferromagnetic, if it's ferritic stanless steel.did think of pilfering a mixing bowl but it is stainless steel which isn't one of the better known magnetic materials
Not if it's austenitic though.
--
I asked a magnet supplier to play with his spheres. He reports that a 19mm magnetic sphere and two steel discs works well.