What equipment do you use?

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

DaveW
Posts: 1702
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:29 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by DaveW »

Think these are what you mean Danny? There's a history of them here, both the 200mm and later the 120mm:-

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/co ... edical.htm

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/co ... dical1.htm

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/co ... edical.htm

DaveW

Danny
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:07 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Danny »

Yep thats the ones Dave. Beautiful lenses IMHO. Charles Chien and I were looking at the Oly bellows macro lenses and the Canon 28 and 35mm bellow lenses, more superb glass. Again, expensive though. I have a feeling Charles did end up with an Oly 20 - 35mm, this one here........

http://www.alanwood.net/photography/oly ... 20-35.html

If not he will correct me somewhere along the way :wink:

All the best Dave, excellent lenses and designs for their day.

Danny.
Worry about the image that comes out of the box, rather than the box itself.

DaveW
Posts: 1702
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:29 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by DaveW »

Wouldn't it have been nice if camera manufacturers had all standardised on one bayonet fitting and lens to film distance so we could use any lens on any camera, particularly the specialist lenses only one camera firm makes.

DaveW

Mike B in OKlahoma
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by Mike B in OKlahoma »

It was before my time, but the old M-mount was a move towards this, as I understand it. Most of the manufacuturer's see locking us into their products as more to their advantage than giving us flexibility, though.
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome

"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin

DaveW
Posts: 1702
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:29 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by DaveW »

Danny,

I don't buy everything new, my bellows, remote release and my complete set of Nikon extension tubes were bought one by one to make up the full set from different sellers secondhand on EBAY.

I am sure the same applies to other makes of equipment. I have even seen Canon MP-E 1x-5x lenses secondhand on EBAY.

Most amateurs do not abuse their equipment so many good secondhand bargains can be had for quality equipment.

DaveW

twebster
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:02 am
Location: Phoenix "Valley of the Sun", Arizona, USA

Post by twebster »

Since I have turned to photography solely for generating income I have pared my equipment list to the absolute minimum amount of equipment I need to make the images I make. There is not a single piece of equipment in my equipment list that sits idle for any length of time. Some equipment is for seasonal use. For example, when the dragonflies start emerging I will be using the 300 f 4L much more than I am currently using it. The 500mm lens I use almost daily. I cannot afford to tie up large amounts of money in unused equipment when I have bills to pay.
Tom Webster

Phoenix "The Valley of the Sun", Arizona, USA

The worst day photographing dragonflies is better than the best day working! :)

Epidic
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Maine

Post by Epidic »

DaveW wrote:Wouldn't it have been nice if camera manufacturers had all standardised on one bayonet fitting and lens to film distance so we could use any lens on any camera, particularly the specialist lenses only one camera firm makes.

DaveW
You just need to move to large-format cameras. All lenses come in standard sizes for lens boards and the lens to film distance is not an isssue.
Will

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic