Canon EOS 60D Adapter

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

flyer2o12
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Canon EOS 60D Adapter

Post by flyer2o12 »

Hey guys,

I would like to purchase an adapter to mount my Canon 60D onto a Nikon Eclipse 80i confocal microscope. Where can I find such an adapter?

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2989
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

Show us pictures of the 80i's port where you want to mount the 60D.

Rogelio

flyer2o12
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by flyer2o12 »

Here's some images of the mount on the Nikon Eclipse 80i.

Image

Image

Image

flyer2o12
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by flyer2o12 »

For anyone interested, this is the one: http://webstore.diaginc.com/DD20NLT-2-0 ... d20nlt.htm

It seems very much over priced at $659...?

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6262
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

I know almost nothing about confocal microscopy, but I assume that the integrated camera is a key part of the image forming system.
Are you planning to use the EOS for confocal or for more normal kinds of illumination?
flyer2o12 wrote:For anyone interested, this is the one: http://webstore.diaginc.com/DD20NLT-2-0 ... d20nlt.htm

It seems very much over priced at $659...?
If you have a big budget and you want an out the box solution it may be OK but...
2X seems too much crop for an APSc camera (1.5X -1.6X is to be recommended for 18 -20mm FN eyepieces. With a widefield microscope 1X to 1.2X may be better to fit the eyepieces FOV).
I would try to make a direct projection adapter: the image from the tube lens directly projected on the sensor without further optics. Perhaps it may be done just with few extension tubes removing the C mount.

PS: I assume you already have the 60D. If not, don't buy it for microscope use, it induces some vibration blur in Live View EFSC unlike other EOS cameras.
Pau

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2989
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

I would go with direct projection, as Pau sugested, but first we have to make sure you have enough distance (44mm + 2mm) to focus on the Canon EOS from the top of the ISO 38 port. The normally distance from the end of the C mount thread to image plane is 17.53mm so we need at least 27mm + 2 mm (for the direct adpater) from the top of the ISO38 to the point where the C1 start (end of the C mount thread).

Rogelio

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2989
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

I forgot to ask, are you the owner of that beast?

Do you have the complete confocal system?

Rogelio

flyer2o12
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by flyer2o12 »

Thanks for the info Pau and Rogelio! I have it sorted now!

This microscope is one of many wonderful microscopes at work :D

g4lab
Posts: 1494
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:07 am

Post by g4lab »

Diagnostic Instruments also have a DD1.2NLT device almost the same as the 2.0 only with less magnification. They fit a 38mm photoport and have a T mount and 1.2x projective

And IMHO $659 is a very reasonable price. The types that this current line replaces had a separate microscope clamp and coupler and usually cost $1500 to 2,500 and they sold enough of them to become a market leader in microscopy and all the major companies quietly sold their gear. I got a large quantity of it that came directly from Zeiss USA.

When they all finally get around to making their own branded gear they charge twice as much and more. LM Scope charges much more and most of the stuff you see on ebay is cheaply made black delrin. It may work but DI is a real company.

I got a Nikon mount coupler from them which Zeiss had for heaven only knows how long. Then I went to stick it on a camera, after probably having it for years too, and discovered the Nikon F mount was not right. It was clear it had escaped through QC. There was no way it could have happened later. So after almost ten years they fixed it free. I was impressed.

Is it me or is the module in your picture the actual confocal scanning unit. I think you will want to put the camera where that digital probably C mount camera goes. If you remove the confocal unit the scope won't be confocal any more.

We do have a list member who was born into the microscope business and
actually repairs Nikon confocals. If you send me a private message I will give you his name if you wish to send him a PM.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic