Rik wrote:Your question is now appearing often enough that it really ought to be covered in the FAQs. I'll get that done later today. Stay tuned...
In the meantime......
You can try just about any microscope objective; but whether it provides good images is another matter.
Short story:
Many microscope objectives were/are dependent on secondary CA correction via the microscope eyepieces. When those objectives are used on their own, as a lense on a DSLR, significant issues with Chromatic Aberration arise.
Some objectives, such as the
finite Nikon CF Plan, BD Plan objectives were designed to correct for CA within the actual objective. These are better suited for use as 'macro' lenses. 'Plan' objectives also provide a more uniform FOV across the entire frame.
Finite microscope objectives have a designated 'tubelength' inscribed on the barrel, for example, 160/- or 210/0. Those numbers (minus 10mm) indicate how far from the sensor or film plane the shoulder of the objective should
ideally be located to produce the designated magnification. Finite objectives do not like to be used too far way from their designated magnification.
Various objectives have different thread sizes. Most (but not all)
finite objectives have RMS threads.
As far as adapters are concerned for attaching an
RMS threaded objective to your Canon DSLR. Here are a few examples of the components. This particular seller provides a good service and stocks many helpful adapters for using microscope objectives for macro photography.
EOS to M42 adapter:
http://cgi.ebay.com/AF-confirm-M42-adap ... 0418311542
RMS to M42:
http://cgi.ebay.com/RMS-Thread-M42-Adap ... 0470968028
RMS Thread to M42 'Cone' Adapter:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/RMS-Thread-M42-A ... 0352400700
Also read the discusion:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=10661
And then there are the
infinity-corrected objectives.....stay tuned, I'm sure they will be addressed in Rik's forthcoming FAQ.
Craig