Big hairy spider

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Big hairy spider

Post by Hairyduck »

well its skin anyway...

This is my first ever prepared bit of tissue :D common house spider, 44 images stacked in hf

Image

Olympus BHA, Brightfield, Nikon CFN plan apo 20x/0.75
Last edited by Hairyduck on Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Spiders give me the "willies." :lol: This is something that I would probably have not ever seen unless I were to have purchased a prepared slide of such a specimen. Very nice stack :D

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

:lol: I think I'd probably avoid live specimins too, thankfully one of our cats brought this one in a little worse for wear

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 24428
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Very nice!

I am interested to see you've happened across some of the same feathered hairs that I was surprised to see on the pedipalp I shot over in Macro.

--Rik

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

yeah, I was surprised to see them in your pic too, the ones in this shot are only about 10 microns long

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 24428
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Hairyduck wrote:the ones in this shot are only about 10 microns long
Hhmm... Can you check your calculations/measurements about that number?

If you're talking about the full length of a feathered hair, then the total field width of your photo would be only about 25 microns -- over an order of magnitude smaller than what's typical for a 20X objective.

Also an NA 0.75 objective will only resolve to about 0.37 microns (ref), about 27 features in 10 microns. Your pictures are a lot sharper than that.

The hairs on my spider's pedipalp are around 100 microns long. I'll bet yours are too.

--Rik

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

:oops: yes, you're right, I was stupidly going by the number on my stage micrometer :) I'll get the hang of these small measurements yet :lol:

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Hairyduck,

Excellent shot! I particularly like they way it works on both the "informational" level as well as an aesthetic/graphic level.

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 24428
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Hairyduck wrote:I'll get the hang of these small measurements yet :lol:
The reason I crosscheck these numbers so carefully is because I mess them up so often myself! :? :lol:

--Rik

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

Thanks Charles, getting there slowly!

Cyclops
Posts: 3103
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

Wow great shots. I for one love spiders. Good thing really considering I have 5 as pets,;)
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic