3 more diatoms for a Tuesday night

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

3 more diatoms for a Tuesday night

Post by Charles Krebs »

Well... two diatoms and a piece of another.


Image

Image

Image

Cyclops
Posts: 3103
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

Very nice,that last one looks very strange. Crossed polarizers?
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

last one is using DIC

I agree, fantastic set of images, the second pic was certainly a challenge I guess!

Cyclops
Posts: 3103
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

Hairyduck wrote:last one is using DIC

I agree, fantastic set of images, the second pic was certainly a challenge I guess!

Hmmm need to research what DIC is.
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Yup, the third image is DIC with a little "twist". I was playing around with some mounting variations. I tried mixing some diatoms with some Canada balsam that I had greatly diluted with xylene. I spread a drop over a cover slip and let it dry. This resulted in diatoms stuck to the slip, but not fully "covered" in mountant. I then put a drop of "normal" consistency Canada balsam on a slide and added the cover slip. (This is all in an effort to find a simple effective method of getting more of the diatoms attached flat against the cover slip). On one slide that I prepared there was an air bubble, and the diatom piece in the third picture above was attached to the cover slip but wound up inside the air bubble. So it is in effect attached to the cover-slip with a thin, uneven layer of balsam. The uneven layer of mountant causes an interesting variation in colors when viewed using DIC. The bubble was basically an accident but I think I may try to use the effect on occasion.

Here's another diatom that wound up in the same situation. You can see that the color variation differs from the "normal" DIC gradation.

Image

Cyclops
Posts: 3103
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

DIC = Differential Interference Contrast lighting?
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

DIC = Differential Interference Contrast lighting?
Yes.

lauriek
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:57 am
Location: South East UK
Contact:

Post by lauriek »

Beautiful (as usual!)

So the third is (twisty) DIC - Are the first two phase contrast?

Cheers!

Hairyduck
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:05 am
Location: UK

Post by Hairyduck »

Cyclops wrote:DIC = Differential Interference Contrast lighting?
also...

DIC = stupidly expensive :(

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Laurie,

All three are DIC. You have some ability to vary the "look" from rather monochrome, to the bright colorful rendition of the last two images seen here.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic