Keratella rotifer

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Keratella rotifer

Post by Charles Krebs »

I put more time into the shots I took last April, but these are a bit different.

The first is a live rotifer with the 100X and DIC (210X on APS-C sized sensor)

The second is auto-fluorescence of an empty lorica. UV (365nm) excitation. In this case I don't think much if any additional information is obtained through use of fluorescence, but I'm always curious how such things react.


Image

Image

Johann
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:58 am
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Post by Johann »

Amazing - I think I prefer these - that close-up is incredible.

Marek Mis
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:56 am
Location: Suwalki, Poland
Contact:

Post by Marek Mis »

Very nice images ! It is K. cochlearis, I think.

Marek

hkv
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:58 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by hkv »

The first one is amazing!

100X oil?

How did you get him to be still? Mine usually dance around all the time.

Olympusman
Posts: 5166
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm

Rotifer

Post by Olympusman »

Wonderful - especially the first one.

Mike
Michael Reese Much FRMS EMS Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA

Jacek
Posts: 5360
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Jacek »

Super

Smokedaddy
Posts: 2009
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
Location: Bigfork, Montana
Contact:

Post by Smokedaddy »

Charles,

Very nice. I've noticed on a few that I've tried to image, even some diatoms that they appear to have a hole in them and you can see through them into the inside. Is that some sort of artifact in the processing or simply a lighting illusion ... kind of like the circled area below.

Would you mind telling me (or someone else can jump in) and tell me what auto-fluorescence means and UV (365nm) excitation? I haven't plugged in or hooked up my fluorescence components yet.

Image

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Smokedaddy wrote:Charles,

Very nice. I've noticed on a few that I've tried to image, even some diatoms that they appear to have a hole in them and you can see through them into the inside. Is that some sort of artifact in the processing or simply a lighting illusion ... kind of like the circled area below.

Would you mind telling me (or someone else can jump in) and tell me what auto-fluorescence means and UV (365nm) excitation? I haven't plugged in or hooked up my fluorescence components yet.
No hole there , just the way the surface is angled.

"Autofluorescence" is a natural emission of light by a subject that has been illuminated with certain wavelengths of light. The majority of fluorescence microscopy is done adding fluorophores (chemical compounds that fluoresce) to the material to be studied.

The light that illuminates the subject is called the "excitation" light. If a subject auto-fluoresces, it will then give off a different, and longer wavelength.This emitted light can be quite dim, so it is important to block any other light that might prevent you from seeing it. This is accomplished by using filters that will block all of the wavelength of the excitation light. Your microscope fluorescence cubes will have such filters. There is a large variety of combinations possible (fluorchromes, excitation wavelengths, filters), and they are typically chosen to work well with certain subjects.

For natural autofluorescence, UV light of about 365nm is generally pretty good at causing many subjects to fluoresce. Also good is blue light of around 450nm.

carlos.uruguay
Posts: 5358
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
Contact:

Post by carlos.uruguay »

Excelent as always

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic