Vorticella

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

pwnell
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Vorticella

Post by pwnell »

Image
Vorticella by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Vorticella (Carolina),40x*1.25, DIC

Image
Vorticella by Waldo Nell, on Flickr
Vorticella (Carolina),40x*1.25, FLUO-C6.1

vasselle
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 2:12 am
Location: France

Post by vasselle »

Hello
Magnifique :smt038
Cordialement seb
Microscope Leitz Laborlux K
Boitier EOS 1200d

Jacek
Posts: 5360
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Jacek »

Very nice

carlos.uruguay
Posts: 5358
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
Contact:

Post by carlos.uruguay »

Perfect

Marek Mis
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:56 am
Location: Suwalki, Poland
Contact:

Post by Marek Mis »

The first image is very nice !

Marek

phil m
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:45 pm

Post by phil m »

nice eyelashes!

pwnell
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

:) Thanks.

Walter Piorkowski
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: South Beloit, Ill

Post by Walter Piorkowski »

That first image is a great shot. The amount of depth in the focus is just perfect. I don't often get the time to look at these subjects and when I do I always catch them from the side. This helps me understand the subject better. Love the DIC. Also noted the high NA of the objective. Impressive.
Walt

pwnell
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

Walter Piorkowski wrote:That first image is a great shot. The amount of depth in the focus is just perfect. I don't often get the time to look at these subjects and when I do I always catch them from the side. This helps me understand the subject better. Love the DIC. Also noted the high NA of the objective. Impressive.
Walt
Oh no the *1.25 is not the NA, it is the magnification changer. The NA was 0.95

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic