please help ID this protist

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

fonakta
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 12:30 am
Location: Hungary

please help ID this protist

Post by fonakta »

Strange ciliate, lenght is approx. 200 microns.
Image
Image

Gyrosigma
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:39 am
Location: France Normandie
Contact:

Post by Gyrosigma »

Hi,
Surely Euplote.sp

regards

Dominique

Bruce Taylor
Posts: 828
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: Wakefield, Quebec / Ottawa, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Bruce Taylor »

Traditionally, this ciliate is called Euplotes. About 20 years ago, the genus was divided, so if we accept the new taxonomy we can only say this is a member of the family Euplotidae, and might be either Euplotes, Euplotoides, Euplotopsis or Moneuplotes (depending on the number and arrangement of ventral cirri and the "silverline" pattern in the pellicle).
It Came from the Pond (Blog): http://www.itcamefromthepond.com/

fonakta
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 12:30 am
Location: Hungary

Post by fonakta »

Thank you all for the quick help.

actinophrys
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:22 pm
Contact:

Post by actinophrys »

Bruce Taylor wrote:Traditionally, this ciliate is called Euplotes. About 20 years ago, the genus was divided, so if we accept the new taxonomy we can only say this is a member of the family Euplotidae, and might be either Euplotes, Euplotoides, Euplotopsis or Moneuplotes (depending on the number and arrangement of ventral cirri and the "silverline" pattern in the pellicle).
That doesn't seem to be a very good division, though; most subsequent work have found those all nested together. See for instance Shao et al., available here, as an example. So personally I'd stick with calling them all Euplotes for the time being; but if it is freshwater, I think the only species that get so large are all part of the Euplotoides subgroup.

Bruce Taylor
Posts: 828
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: Wakefield, Quebec / Ottawa, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Bruce Taylor »

actinophrys wrote:See for instance Shao et al., available here, as an example. So personally I'd stick with calling them all Euplotes for the time being; but if it is freshwater, I think the only species that get so large are all part of the Euplotoides subgroup.
Thanks, Josh, I hadn't read that! Euplotoides & Moneuplotes seem to have held up reasonably well, but you're right...better to stick with the old names until it gets sorted out. :)
It Came from the Pond (Blog): http://www.itcamefromthepond.com/

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic