Diatom, Algae and Stentor Ciliate

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Diatom, Algae and Stentor Ciliate

Post by pwnell »

For those wondering, GTF is simply an abbreviation for the location where I collected these specimens. Oh by the way - Charles, the stentor ciliate photos were taken at ISO3200 - something the 600D would never achieve with that little noise. A good example where my setup without flash benefits from the 6D's larger sensor and my ability to crank up the ISO to try and stop motion on the cirri.

Image
20140531-DSLR_IMG_0037-Edit.jpg by pwnell, on Flickr
GTF - diatom,60x/1.2x*1.25, DIC, HF B

Image
20140531-DSLR_IMG_0104.jpg by pwnell, on Flickr
GTF - Stentor ciliate,40x, DIC

Image
20140531-DSLR_IMG_0105.jpg by pwnell, on Flickr
GTF - Stentor ciliate,40x, DIC

Image
20140531-DSLR_IMG_0117-Edit.jpg by pwnell, on Flickr
GTF algae,20x, DIC, HF B

Image
20140531-DSLR_IMG_0224-Edit.jpg by pwnell, on Flickr
GTF algae,60x/1.2, POL, HF A

_Michal_
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Poland

Post by _Michal_ »

Great, as always :D

Jacek
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Jacek »

first image marvel

arturoag75
Posts: 1600
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:05 am
Location: italy
Contact:

Post by arturoag75 »

Great...i' m impressed by your 60x water obj. :shock:

Marek Mis
Posts: 2586
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:56 am
Location: Suwalki, Poland
Contact:

Post by Marek Mis »

Very nice images. The quality of the first one is incredible !

By the way, what factors suggest you to choose HF "A" or "B" ? What does it depend on ?

Marek

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2975
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

Nice set!

The noise on the 6D is lower than 600D?

Rogelio

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

arturoag75 wrote:Great...i' m impressed by your 60x water obj. :shock:
Thanks, me too. The big thing about the water objective is that I can use it all the time and get much greater resolution than with the 40/0.95 alone. Unlike the 60x/1.35 which is technically better (for ideal samples and 0.17mm coverslips) but for which I need to use oil which makes a huge mess.

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

Marek Mis wrote:Very nice images. The quality of the first one is incredible !

By the way, what factors suggest you to choose HF "A" or "B" ? What does it depend on ?
Thanks Marek,

By now I am quite tuned to which method works best for which kind of illumination. HF B works best most of the time, especially for DIC. HF A works best when there are bright highlights or a challenging subject. HF C works best for fluorescence. But the rule is not set. My approach is per above, and if the result is not what I want I'll try the other methods and pick the best.

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

RogelioMoreno wrote:Nice set!

The noise on the 6D is lower than 600D?
Thanks. Yes, by quite a large margin. With the 600D (APS-C) at ISO 3200 the noise would have destroyed much of the cirri on the ciliate's body. With the 6D (Full Frame) the details are all still there.

TasMan
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:27 am

Post by TasMan »

These are great pwnell, I especially like the one of the diatom. I have a "newby" question though, how do you get the backgrounds so uniform and clean? Is it done in post? If so do you have any tips how to do it well? I seem to end up with a lot of distraction in the background of my photos that is nearly impossible to get rid of :-)

vasselle
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 2:12 am
Location: France

Post by vasselle »

Very nice photos

pwnell
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Tsawwassen, Canada

Post by pwnell »

TasMan wrote:These are great pwnell, I especially like the one of the diatom. I have a "newby" question though, how do you get the backgrounds so uniform and clean? Is it done in post? If so do you have any tips how to do it well? I seem to end up with a lot of distraction in the background of my photos that is nearly impossible to get rid of :-)
Thanks. It depends on the subject. For instance, the ciliates I barely did anything to the background - that is pretty much directly from the camera. Same with the diatom - I did not touch the background. But the algae DIC photo had lots of disturbing elements - especially caused by small swimming protists that wreaks havoc with the stacking algorithms so there I cleaned the background in post.

carlos.uruguay
Posts: 5358
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
Contact:

Post by carlos.uruguay »

Very nice!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic