birefringent pig louse

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

Frank
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:47 pm
Location: Long Island

birefringent pig louse

Post by Frank »

I have two antique slides of Haematopinus suis, pig louse mounted in a media. Viewed with transmitted light both specimens are similar but when polarizers are inserted into the light path the one pictured is highly birefringent while the other remains evenly dark except for the claw's tips. Any ideas as to why the two slides are different? Could it be the mounting medium? Nikon BD 210 5x, Zerene PMax, stack and stitch.Image[img

Cactusdave
Posts: 1631
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
Location: Bromley, Kent, UK

Post by Cactusdave »

I believe that differences in the methods that the two different mounters used to prepare and clear the specimen before mounting, account for the differences. Lengthy soaking in alkali was often used to help soften and decolourise this sort of specimen. This causes loss of birefringent biological material from the inside of the louse. Specimens prepared by methods avoiding alkali are more likely to look good under polarised light, and in particular will have well preserved muscles which show clearly under polarisation.
Leitz Ortholux 1, Zeiss standard, Nikon Diaphot inverted, Canon photographic gear

Frank
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:47 pm
Location: Long Island

Post by Frank »

Hi CD
Thanks for your thoughtful reply and I suspect it is the correct answer rather than my guess if it being the mounting medium. The mounting medium on both slides is optically isotropic. The anisotropic material is mainly the chitinous exoskeleton of one specimen. Perhaps the alkali clearing method removed the layer from the inside of the exoskeleton that is producing the chitin.
Frank

carlos.uruguay
Posts: 5358
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
Contact:

Post by carlos.uruguay »

Excellent Frank

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic