Gloeotrichia natans

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Ecki
Posts: 775
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:04 am
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Contact:

Gloeotrichia natans

Post by Ecki »

While walking around Berlin's Botanical Garden I noticed some small yellow brownish mucilage balls in a pond. Under the microscope these balls appeared to be colonies of the Cyanobacteria Gloeotrichia natans. The basal ball is the heterocyst. The trichome has a distinct curved form.

Image
40x, Jamin-Lebedeff Interference

Image
40x, Jamin-Lebedeff Interference

Image
63x, DIC

Image
63x, Autofluorescence

The first two images were shot with an old shiny black Zeiss Standard WL, equipped with the extinct Jamin-Lebedeff interference contrast., that I managed to acquire recently.

Best regards,
Ecki

Jacek
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Jacek »

The first two photos of what the technology / contrast /?
interesting

Ecki
Posts: 775
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:04 am
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Contact:

Post by Ecki »

http://microscope.database.free.fr/Acce ... bedeff.pdf

This describes the interference method best.

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2975
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

Ecki,

Very nice and intesresting specimen and Jamin-Lebedeff Interference
method!

Rogelio

carlos.uruguay
Posts: 5358
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
Contact:

Post by carlos.uruguay »

Impressive!!

curt0909
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:06 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by curt0909 »

Great! I was waiting for these since the last post when you mentioned you had the scope. The results are better than I expected. I'm looking forward to seeing more of these.

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 5993
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

Very nice images and super interesting Jamin-Lebedeff Interference method, maybe old but undoubtely new for most of us.

The J-L images are excellent but do show less resolution than DIC, of course it isn't surprising as 40X (dry?) vs 63X (1.4?) may not a be a fair comparison. Did you compare the J-L images with DIC 40X ones with objectives of similar NA?
Pau

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic