Hi,
i would like to ask, if someone did microfotos of edges from cutting devices. I find it one of the most difficult matter. Today i used the B + L 50 U.L.W.D. with B + L 10 x ocular projection. Ilumination two ledlights and diffusor.
The object was a new rasor blade of a oneway rasor.
The foto was stacked with Zerene in Dmap mode using 28 Fotos 1 µm apart. The object was allmoust paralell in plane not to need much fotos. After sharping a little it undervent a short visit in the new Clarity from DxO labs
I realy would like to know if one could do this much better ?
Thank you
Lothar
how to do cutting edges ?
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Lothar-Gutjahr
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Greece Perachora/Loutaki
I'm not sure what I'm seeing..
There's a band of grinding lines, coloured by what looks like speckles. (More diffusion might change the appearance of that?)
Then above, after the dark part (different angle?) there's a pale band lighter than the background, with a "tooth" projecting into it. Is that the polished edge?
I've noticed a couple of different constructions ( therefore alloys, I assume) of disposable razor blades.
Sometimes there's a hard strip spot-welded to a stronger L shape, for rigidity.
Sometimes there's evidence of high-frequency induction hardening, right at the edge of a blade.
I believe they're sometimes heat treated on the edge by laser.
They're sharper and thinner than scalpels. With care they can be used to cut finer things!
There's a band of grinding lines, coloured by what looks like speckles. (More diffusion might change the appearance of that?)
Then above, after the dark part (different angle?) there's a pale band lighter than the background, with a "tooth" projecting into it. Is that the polished edge?
I've noticed a couple of different constructions ( therefore alloys, I assume) of disposable razor blades.
Sometimes there's a hard strip spot-welded to a stronger L shape, for rigidity.
Sometimes there's evidence of high-frequency induction hardening, right at the edge of a blade.
I believe they're sometimes heat treated on the edge by laser.
They're sharper and thinner than scalpels. With care they can be used to cut finer things!
- Lothar-Gutjahr
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Greece Perachora/Loutaki
Hi Chris,
thanks for looking ! This 500 x fold enlarged foto on a redish background shows a stripe of halo from stacking. What you call the dark part ( diferent angle) is the polished edge an everything on top of it is background including the pale band.
I´ll give it another try with more diffusion and also try Pmax mode while stacking.
have a nice day
Lothar
thanks for looking ! This 500 x fold enlarged foto on a redish background shows a stripe of halo from stacking. What you call the dark part ( diferent angle) is the polished edge an everything on top of it is background including the pale band.
I´ll give it another try with more diffusion and also try Pmax mode while stacking.
have a nice day
Lothar
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23972
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
DMap should be the best method for stacking this sort of subject, because it has simple geometry with no overlaps and no sudden changes in depth.
The halo we see here will not be produced by DMap when it is used as intended. I suggest reviewing How To Use DMap to learn about using the slider to make background "go black in preview". For this sort of subject you will need a slider setting around Percentile 50.
--Rik
The halo we see here will not be produced by DMap when it is used as intended. I suggest reviewing How To Use DMap to learn about using the slider to make background "go black in preview". For this sort of subject you will need a slider setting around Percentile 50.
--Rik
- Lothar-Gutjahr
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Greece Perachora/Loutaki
- Lothar-Gutjahr
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Greece Perachora/Loutaki
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:54 am
- Location: Nottinghamshire, England
- Lothar-Gutjahr
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Greece Perachora/Loutaki
Hi,
i used the B + L 50 U.L.W.D. with B + L 10 x ocular projection which calculates to 500 x fold. The camera was Canon 1000 D and full view, no crop. The CMOS sensor has a size from 22,2 x 14,8 mm and i dont know if that is same as a the so called APS-C-Sensor?
Using my "UFOMI" with M 42 bellow i have no chance to compare to a ocular view. My viewing is a 32" flat screen in lifeview mode.
I hope this helps you. Thanks for stopping by.
Lothar
i used the B + L 50 U.L.W.D. with B + L 10 x ocular projection which calculates to 500 x fold. The camera was Canon 1000 D and full view, no crop. The CMOS sensor has a size from 22,2 x 14,8 mm and i dont know if that is same as a the so called APS-C-Sensor?
Using my "UFOMI" with M 42 bellow i have no chance to compare to a ocular view. My viewing is a 32" flat screen in lifeview mode.
I hope this helps you. Thanks for stopping by.
Lothar