Mayfly nymph
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Mayfly nymph
1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 are (partially) crossed polarizers in brightfield. 4 and 7 are DIC.
With these I find the respiratory system and "tails" most interesting.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 4/0.16. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 22 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 4/0.16. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 12 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 20 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. DIC illumination. 23 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 35 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 28 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. DIC illumination (DIsney Chrome in this case ). 28 image stack.
With these I find the respiratory system and "tails" most interesting.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 4/0.16. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 22 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 4/0.16. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 12 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 20 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. DIC illumination. 23 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 35 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. Brightfield with partially crossed polarizers. 28 image stack.
Olympus BHS, Olympus S Plan Apo 10/0.40. DIC illumination (DIsney Chrome in this case ). 28 image stack.
Last edited by Charles Krebs on Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Cactusdave
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
- Location: Bromley, Kent, UK
Great work, I love the first image. Are these stacked or is the depth due to judicious use of the aperture diaphragm? There is a quality of sharpness and solidity in these images and those from Jacek, that I much admire and envy.
Leitz Ortholux 1, Zeiss standard, Nikon Diaphot inverted, Canon photographic gear
- Planapo
- Posts: 1585
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:33 am
- Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe
Lovely!
As I have a better understanding and a little practical experience of how DIC is set-up and working now , I'd think that you've stacked the last one with the upper prism moved between single shots?
--Betty
As I have a better understanding and a little practical experience of how DIC is set-up and working now , I'd think that you've stacked the last one with the upper prism moved between single shots?
--Betty
Atticus Finch: "You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view
- until you climb into his skin and walk around in it."
Lee, N. H. 1960. To Kill a Mockingbird. J. B. Lippincott, New York.
- until you climb into his skin and walk around in it."
Lee, N. H. 1960. To Kill a Mockingbird. J. B. Lippincott, New York.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:59 am
- Location: Italy
I like very much the first picture. It is looking like an extraterrestrial animal, maybe coming from Mars (not yet discovered from "Curiosity").
My questions: What objective did you use for the first picture: probably 4x,
but planapo, apo , fluor, achromatic ecc. ? It is a stack with how many pictures?
Franz
My questions: What objective did you use for the first picture: probably 4x,
but planapo, apo , fluor, achromatic ecc. ? It is a stack with how many pictures?
Franz
Wonderful, Charles.
You keep raising the bar and you are a great inspiration to us all.
About the last one: a real winner for next months pm.net frontpage.
You keep raising the bar and you are a great inspiration to us all.
About the last one: a real winner for next months pm.net frontpage.
Fred
Canonian@Flickr
Canonian@Flickr
-
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: Panama
- Wim van Egmond
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:28 am
- Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs, the Netherlands
- Contact:
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Thanks all for the kind remarks!
Dave and Franz....
I've gone back and added some info to each picture. The first two are with the Olympus 4/0.16 S Plan Apo; and all are from "stacks".
Betty...
While the polarizers and DIC make for interesting results with the subject in the last three shots, I think I actually prefer the results from "plain old" brightfield and darkfield done a while ago (see what you think...):
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... php?t=8400
Dave and Franz....
I've gone back and added some info to each picture. The first two are with the Olympus 4/0.16 S Plan Apo; and all are from "stacks".
Betty...
Good guess, and I wish that were the case . Unfortunately this is the result of a troubling aspects of my DIC set-up. With the 10X is it very difficult to get a homogenous background, both in terms of color and density. With a "grey" background I can tweak the DIC settings to get a useable result. But when the slider is dialed up into the "colors" it is hard to avoid a multi-color background. In this shot I just decided to "use it" since it made an interesting result with the geometry of the subject.I'd think that you've stacked the last one with the upper prism moved between single shots?
While the polarizers and DIC make for interesting results with the subject in the last three shots, I think I actually prefer the results from "plain old" brightfield and darkfield done a while ago (see what you think...):
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... php?t=8400
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:56 pm
- Location: España
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact: