All taken with UPlanFL N 40x/0.75 except the DIC image which was UPlanSApo 40x/0.95. All images had an additional 2x magnification from the magnification changer, and are cropped slightly.
I purchased these diatoms from Klaus Kemp in the UK. I am sure many of you know his excellent work.
Bright field
Dark field
Phase contrast
DIC
More diatoms
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Cactusdave
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
- Location: Bromley, Kent, UK
Waldo, nice quality images.
Dave, in the posted pictures I don't see more resolution but a more pleasing look (very subjective) of the DIC one over the others, just the Phase one has a bit less resolution (as expected because the phase rings are smaller than the maximun objective aperture, lowering the actual NA). Look at the finer dots of StauroneisCactusdave wrote:Some nice images there. The resolution is excellent, especially in the DIC picture.
Pau
- Cactusdave
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
- Location: Bromley, Kent, UK
You are right Pau. There isn't more 'actual' resolution in the DIC image compared with the darkfield image. The DIC effect gives (to me at least) a better visual perception of detail.
Waldo, that last image with the Planapo lens is very nice indeed. To stack images at this magnification requires a very steady hand on the fine focus (unless of course you are lucky enough to have motorised fine focus )and it is easy to get stacking artifacts, especially halos.
Waldo, that last image with the Planapo lens is very nice indeed. To stack images at this magnification requires a very steady hand on the fine focus (unless of course you are lucky enough to have motorised fine focus )and it is easy to get stacking artifacts, especially halos.
Leitz Ortholux 1, Zeiss standard, Nikon Diaphot inverted, Canon photographic gear