Red Stentor sp.
Red Stentor /DF/
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 2982
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: Panama
- arturoag75
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:05 am
- Location: italy
- Contact:
In the area of my city is a lot of ponds and lakes, Stentor is in me is very common.
Marek
use of such a microscope:
http://deltaoptical.pl/blizej_zycia/mik ... d1678.html
and condenser to him:
http://deltaoptical.pl/kondensor-do-cie ... d1581.html
Optics have all the listed primarily on the Nikon / lenses, glasses /
I'm using a second microscope / Biolar B / - only for DIC
Marek
use of such a microscope:
http://deltaoptical.pl/blizej_zycia/mik ... d1678.html
and condenser to him:
http://deltaoptical.pl/kondensor-do-cie ... d1581.html
Optics have all the listed primarily on the Nikon / lenses, glasses /
I'm using a second microscope / Biolar B / - only for DIC
-
- Posts: 2982
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: Panama
-
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:49 pm
- Location: Wakefield, Quebec / Ottawa, Ontario
- Contact:
Fascinating and beautiful.
Two Stentors are described as being red in transmitted light: Stentor rubra Bary (which Foissner does not think has been properly differentiated from S. igneus); and Stentor tartari, which may be synonymous with S. andreseni. The first has one macronucleus; the second has two (rarely three).
Others look red in reflected light, or turn red on contact with certain chemicals. And S. amethystinus(single macronucleus, like S. rubra) is described as purplish-red, in some cases.
If the macronucleus were resolved more clearly perhaps the species could be determined.
See Foissner's very useful revision of the genus (1994):
http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/3/255.short
and a description of S. tartari:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 3687.x/pdf
Tartar's book _Biology of Stentor_ can be freely downloaded from the internet archive: http://archive.org/details/biologyofstentor00tart
Two Stentors are described as being red in transmitted light: Stentor rubra Bary (which Foissner does not think has been properly differentiated from S. igneus); and Stentor tartari, which may be synonymous with S. andreseni. The first has one macronucleus; the second has two (rarely three).
Others look red in reflected light, or turn red on contact with certain chemicals. And S. amethystinus(single macronucleus, like S. rubra) is described as purplish-red, in some cases.
If the macronucleus were resolved more clearly perhaps the species could be determined.
See Foissner's very useful revision of the genus (1994):
http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/3/255.short
and a description of S. tartari:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 3687.x/pdf
Tartar's book _Biology of Stentor_ can be freely downloaded from the internet archive: http://archive.org/details/biologyofstentor00tart