SPIDERS No.41 – The Calamistrum
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill
SPIDERS No.41 – The Calamistrum
Image 1
End of leg four showing the calamistrum on the metatarsus segment of the leg. The spiders abdomen is in the background.
Leitz UO 6.5X Achromat
Diffused fiber optic illumination.
26 images at .001 inch increments.
Image 2
Detail of the metatarsus leg segment and the calamistrum comb.
Nikon 20X Achromat
Diffused fiber optic illumination.
254 images at 1 micron increments.
Image 3
High magnification attempt at revealing the location of the opening in the hair that exposes the fine cuticular teeth. These comb the silk from the cribellum. The opened slit is visible where the hair is bent or curved. The cuticular teeth are beyond the resolution of my optical microscope.
Leitz UO 75X Apo., Oil, Plus mirror condenser. Full EPI illumination.
47 images at 1/2 micron increments
Image 4
High magnification shot of the last 3-4 hairs of the calamistrum at the tarsal end. The difference in the calamistrum hairs verses the three normal leg hairs is apparent.
Leitz UO 75X Apo., Oil, Plus mirror condenser. Full EPI illumination.
89 images at 1/2 micron increments
Leitz Ortholux microscope
4X Leitz projection eyepiece plus 1/3x relay lens
Canon 50D
Zerene PMax stacking.
Processing in Photoshop, Bibble Pro5
Spiders of the crebulate type have a silk producing organ called the cribellum. It produces tens of thousands of minute silk strands only 0.01 micrometers in diameter.
A comb like feature is found on the rear legs. However the hairs are far from the most interesting feature of the calamistrum. On the surface of the hairs, similar to seeing the corn seeds exposed when first stripping an ear of corn, is a row of micro fine teeth. These are the objects that actually comb the strands of silk, only 0.01 micrometers in diameter, into a wooly like strand.
Our subject is the same spider of genus Ubolorus that is in Spiders No. 40.
Walt
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2982
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: Panama
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
As a quick quideline, the wavelength of light is about 0.5 micrometers. At 0.01 micrometers, those fine strands are really small!Mitch640 wrote:I never made the mental jump from inches to millimeters, even though it happened here in the US when I was in my teens. And I certainly can't picture what 0.01 micrometers looks like. So how many of those fine strands can fit between the teeth of those micro combs?
Assuming that last image is full frame, then its total frame width is about 0.22 millimeters (22 mm sensor width, divided by total magnification of 75*4/3). Each pixel is then 0.275 micrometers (0.22/800). The space between the microhairs on the hairs is about 2 pixels, call it 0.5 micrometers, so in theory about 50 of those fine strands side-by-side even between the smallest hairs on the hairs. Between the large hairs on the comb -- too many to think about!
See http://www.americanarachnology.org/JoA_ ... 1_p161.pdf for some further information on "ULTRASTRUCTURE OF CRIBELLATE SILK..." in the Journal of Arachnology.
--Rik
Edit: provided a better URL for the reference.
Last edited by rjlittlefield on Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact: