SPIDERS No.37 – A Discarded Exoskeleton Part 1 – Carapace
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill
SPIDERS No.37 – A Discarded Exoskeleton Part 1 – Carapace
Image 1
Details of the exterior view of the carapace exoskeleton or, the former external face and eye surfaces. There is no spider here, just the remains of its former exoskeleton, hairs and eye surfaces included. Note the quantity of plumose hairs on this species.
Olympus 10x S Plan Achromat, 192 images at 5 micron increments.
Image 2
A wider view of the exterior side of the carapace molt shell.
Leitz 4x Plan Fluorite, 50 images at .002 inch increments.
Image 3
Details of the interior view of the carapace molt shell or, the former inside surface that was in contact with the now fresh new exoskeleton. Note that some of the new plumose hairs have remained stuck and were lost to the old exoskeleton surface. The former eye surfaces are concave.
Olympus 10x S Plan Achromat, 142 images at 5 micron increments.
Image 4
Again, a wider view of the interior side of the carapace molt shell. Please note that the oval pattern below the eyes is a small application of petroleum jelly used to hold and position the delicate carapace mold. You are seeing it through the semitransparent exoskeleton material.
Leitz 4x Plan Fluorite, 50 images at .002 inch increments.
Image 5
An additional single frame view of the inside surface showing how thin the casting of the carapace is.
Leitz 4x Plan Fluorite 1 image.
All images made with reflected diffused fiber-optic illumination.
Leitz Ortholux microscope
4X Leitz projection eyepiece plus 1/3x relay lens
Canon 50D
Zerene PMax stacking.
Processing in Photoshop, Bibble Pro5
Thank you for looking at these strange images. I have always been fascinated by the fact that a spider can shed its outer surface several times in its lifetime in order to grow and even sexually mature. Little did I realize how extensive this exchange to a new surface would be. I start with the carapace because it reminds me so much of a death mask, recording every feature of the spider’s former “face”.
The carapace mold that these images show appears to be the only part of the exoskeleton that this spider sheds as a separate, intact piece. In its whole, not present in these images, it resembles the glass canopy of a jet fighter that the pilot would jettison before launching the ejector seat. The eye side is the part of this piece that I show in detail here.
I had at one time, expected there to be eight holes were it covered the eyes. However, as you can see, the eye surfaces are being shed with the rest of the exoskeleton. A good reference image to this is image #1 from Spiders No. 36 were the uniformity of the eyes is unbroken with respect to the surrounding surface.
I was able to obtain these images and those of the next installment due to a bit of luck for me but a tragedy for the spider involved. It died for some reason as it was extracting itself from its old exoskeleton. Only its abdomen remained in the former material when it expired. It was one of my terrarium subjects so the extremely delicate shell remained in very good condition.
If you are interested I would like your opinions on the following:
In image #1, look carefully at the large articulated hairs, like the single one and then the pair below and dead center between the set of four eyes. Then find their location on the underside image #3. In Image #3, it appears to me that there are openings in the center of the round surface depression. This indicates to me that the hairs were pulled free, leaving a hollow tapered core. Or in other words, the original hair is retained with the molt built around it. Either that or they have snapped off and will be re-grown.
What do you think?
Walt
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23937
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: SPIDERS No.37 – A Discarded Exoskeleton Part 1 – Carapac
The appearance suggests that the core has been withdrawn, and that would make sense for a structure as large as those bristles. As I noted in your other thread, Foelix in "Biology of Spiders" makes clear that new sensory hairs are grown from scratch, but I can't find any comment about the large bristles.Walter Piorkowski wrote:In Image #3, it appears to me that there are openings in the center of the round surface depression. This indicates to me that the hairs were pulled free, leaving a hollow tapered core. Or in other words, the original hair is retained with the molt built around it. Either that or they have snapped off and will be re-grown.
What do you think?
I suspect that direct visual examination with a 50X objective would have little enough DOF to make clear whether there's a hole down the center. Have you tried that?
--Rik
-
- Posts: 5124
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm
Spider molt
Walter,
What an incredible find and fabulous images.
Mike
What an incredible find and fabulous images.
Mike
Michael Reese Much FRMS EMS Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill
Hi Rik. It is my feeling that the core has been withdrawn also. As luck would have it the specimen did not last long enough for a higher magnification examination. I would note though that unless it is a creation of the stacking software, it appears to me that you can see through the top bristle in image number 1.
Thank you Mike and welcome to the forum.
Hi Mitch. Getting these shots does take some practice. I treat my microscope stage like a miniature photo studio. Then I apply the same studio techniques I studied in the text books. A big part of getting detail is in the lighting.
It is interesting you should mention the handling of the subject matter. A lot of thought was given to this before I started. As I worked I made certain that I got the image I wanted before making any changes. As expected the part was destroyed before I was finished with it.
Regarding the handling of the carapace, technically there was not much touching till the end. Gravity was used to slide and direct it into place while wearing a face mask so my breath wouldn’t “flick” it away. No force was applied until the jelly was employed which in the end ruined it.
Walt
Thank you Mike and welcome to the forum.
Hi Mitch. Getting these shots does take some practice. I treat my microscope stage like a miniature photo studio. Then I apply the same studio techniques I studied in the text books. A big part of getting detail is in the lighting.
It is interesting you should mention the handling of the subject matter. A lot of thought was given to this before I started. As I worked I made certain that I got the image I wanted before making any changes. As expected the part was destroyed before I was finished with it.
Regarding the handling of the carapace, technically there was not much touching till the end. Gravity was used to slide and direct it into place while wearing a face mask so my breath wouldn’t “flick” it away. No force was applied until the jelly was employed which in the end ruined it.
Walt
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23937
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
That could easily be artifact, the "transparent foreground" effect that occurs when a lens looks around foreground features to see focused background.Walter Piorkowski wrote:I would note though that unless it is a creation of the stacking software, it appears to me that you can see through the top bristle in image number 1.
--Rik
number 3 and 4 are stunning, just like Carpenter's Thing...
my FB page
I'm looking for the the extemely rare V-IM magnification changer for the E800 scope. If you have seen a listing or have one for sale please let me know.
I'm looking for the the extemely rare V-IM magnification changer for the E800 scope. If you have seen a listing or have one for sale please let me know.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill