Whew! I had meant to post a new message and added to this one by mistake... took me 5 or 6 edits to figure out the character limit for the subject title!
On the honey bee leg image posted the other day I pointed out the pollen rake. The slide was still on the scope so I decided to look at it in more detail. The bee uses this "rake" to scrape together the pollen that is collected on the pollen brush of the opposite rear leg. This pollen is then moved into the leg joint where it is crushed against the auricle as the bee flexes its leg. It is then stored in the pollen basket located on the outside of the tibia. The tips of each bristle is flattened and squared off, like a slot screwdriver tip (you can see this best on the two or three at the left side). The bristles have various amounts of "twist" to them, perhaps making them perform their function more efficiently.
This was taken with a 25x Zeiss Neofluor using the same incident lighting used for the overall leg shot. I was sort of surprised that it illuminated as well as it did since the working distance is so small. I was also surprised that it "stacked" pretty nicely since each individual image looked rather hopeless.
Honey bee, pollen rake detail..and.. the "CRUSHER"
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Honey bee, pollen rake detail..and.. the "CRUSHER"
Last edited by Charles Krebs on Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:58 pm, edited 6 times in total.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 24057
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Honey bee, pollen rake detail
Charlie, this is very beautiful, as always!
You commented:
--Rik
You commented:
I have done only a handful of stacks with a 20X objective (NA=0.40), but I had exactly that same reaction on each one. Can you post out an example or two, like I did at the end of this click beetle thread? And by the way, what is the working distance for that 25X objective?I was also surprised that it "stacked" pretty nicely since each individual image looked rather hopeless.
--Rik
- Bruce Williams
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm
- Location: Northamptonshire, England
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:42 pm
- Location: South Beloit, Ill
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Walt... the internet . There is quite a bit there, but these two pages were most helpful:
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultran ... sects.html
http://plantphys.info/Plants_Human/bees/bees.html
Rik... here are two "stack" images and the "final" at bottom. There were 55 images in the stack.
The 25x Neofluar has a na of 0.60 and the working distance is quite small. I don't have the specs, but it is not the solution you're looking for
It is not very happy without a cover slip (one was used for this shot). I think for a 20x used for incident light and stacking, a "M" type objective would be best (no cover slip), but even with these, working distance will need to be looked at carefully.
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultran ... sects.html
http://plantphys.info/Plants_Human/bees/bees.html
Rik... here are two "stack" images and the "final" at bottom. There were 55 images in the stack.
The 25x Neofluar has a na of 0.60 and the working distance is quite small. I don't have the specs, but it is not the solution you're looking for
It is not very happy without a cover slip (one was used for this shot). I think for a 20x used for incident light and stacking, a "M" type objective would be best (no cover slip), but even with these, working distance will need to be looked at carefully.
Last edited by Charles Krebs on Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
Pollen packer, honey bee... the "crusher"
This will complete this set of shots. I had not intended to do this many (actually I was just playing around trying some lighting variations) but I do find it an interesting subject.
The top shot provides some context for the relationship between the rake and the auricle. The rake is at the lower end of the hind tibia, and the auricle is at the "top" end of the first tarsal segment. (In the top photo, the joint "pivot" would be just outside the image area, left side/central).
These two images give a pretty good look at the auricle... aka "anvil", "crusher". (The lower image is a cropped section of the upper).
Just looking at its surface, it is obvious how well this specialized feature would perform the task of crushing the pollen grains when the leg is flexed.
Nikon CFN Plan 10/0.30, Canon 350D. Stacked with Helicon Focus)
The top shot provides some context for the relationship between the rake and the auricle. The rake is at the lower end of the hind tibia, and the auricle is at the "top" end of the first tarsal segment. (In the top photo, the joint "pivot" would be just outside the image area, left side/central).
These two images give a pretty good look at the auricle... aka "anvil", "crusher". (The lower image is a cropped section of the upper).
Just looking at its surface, it is obvious how well this specialized feature would perform the task of crushing the pollen grains when the leg is flexed.
Nikon CFN Plan 10/0.30, Canon 350D. Stacked with Helicon Focus)