Netzelia, testate amoeba, ingesting alga

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: Chris S., Pau, Beatsy, rjlittlefield, ChrisR

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Netzelia, testate amoeba, ingesting alga

Post by Charles Krebs »

Not the most unique subject, but I found the behavioral aspect interesting.

These were simply placed on a slide with a drop of water. I did not use a cover slip because I did not want to crush them (and I was too lazy to use the technique I might normally employ... Vaseline spots at the four corners of a slip :wink:). Also, since these were active, I thought perhaps as the water evaporated to the point where they were just barely covered they might become less mobile.

The first shot was frustrating in that I needed to do a stack, and the water was still a little too deep to inhibit their motion. While these amoeba don't move around rapidly, they move enough to make obtaining a stack tricky (especially when there are 4 of them). What I did was to take a short HD video clip while running the focus from top to bottom. I extracted the individual frames and stacked them. Quality is not all that bad, but not what can be done if everyone would hold still!

The second shot was with a 20X and DIC. Here the water level was just barely below the top of the tests and I was able to shoot a stack in the conventional manner. My 20X is not really a happy performer without a 0.17 cover slip, (and the uneven water surface causes some weird effects as well), but it did OK.

Image

Image

discomorphella
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:26 pm
Location: NW USA

Post by discomorphella »

Hi Charlie--

You do realize that you just shot a better stack without a coverslip than I could with one...Which 20X is this? An SplanApo 20/0.7? Did the amoebae eventually get their "algal spaghetti" completely inside their shells?

David

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

David,
Yes, it is the S Plan Apo 20/0.7. It's the highest dry NA I have without a correction collar, which is probably why it seems so touchy to me. But it is my favorite of the S Plan Apos.

I don't think they actually ingest the overall cells with alga like this. I've seen other species of testate amoeba basically get through the cell wall, then "go inside" the cell and clean it out. See first and the (added) forth shot here:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... .php?t=643
I think these do the same, but pull the end into the test while doing so.

Not only does the wavy water surface cause optical havoc, it can provide some strange backgrounds if you get playful with the DIC slider :wink:

Image

arturoag75
Posts: 1600
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:05 am
Location: italy
Contact:

Post by arturoag75 »

Charlie,
these are amazing :shock:
arturo

Mitch640
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:43 pm

Post by Mitch640 »

Amazing images. It never crossed my mind that they would eat spirogyra like that.
These were simply placed on a slide with a drop of water.
A couple of questions here. Were you working with a stereo scope to find these to place them on a slide? And how do you overcome the spherical aberrations of surface tension? I'd love to know that trick. :) [ah, DIC cuts right through it?]

discomorphella
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:26 pm
Location: NW USA

Post by discomorphella »

Hi Mitch--

There's spherical abberation even with a flat water or glass / air interface. Most biological objectives are designed to compensate out the SA from a 170 micron thick coverglass (hence the "0.17" label on a lot of objectives, and the "0" on metallurgical objectives...). Since DIC is better at rejecting light from out of the focal plane it will help at least a bit. In this case, having a very thin layer of remaining water helps a lot as well. This source of SA is one of the main limiters to getting high-resolution shots of critters in wet mounts. Ideally you'd like to use your 1.3 to 1.4 NA objectives to view protozoa, but they are all oil immersion lenses. The water (refractive index ~1.33 at 550 nm or so) and immersion oil (~1.52) interface will produce SA, even for a nice flat interface, and the depth of the water will change the SA. This will often wreck your nice high contrast image unless you have an incredibly thin layer of water, or you've cleverly stuck your creatures to the very underside of the coverglass. There are (pricey) 1.25 NA water immersion objectives with adjustable SA correction lens systems built in (controlled by the so-called "collar"), and also dry (NA 0.85 to 0.95) objectives with similar correction collars. In many cases its better to use the dry 0.85 to 0.95 NA objective with the collar than the higher NA oil lens for wet mounts for this reason. I have used custom oil immersion objectives with correction collars for semiconductor work but I haven't encountered any for biological use.

David

RogelioMoreno
Posts: 2989
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Panama

Post by RogelioMoreno »

Tha second picture is amazing!

Rogelio

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic