Paulinella amoebe

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

René
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:22 am

Paulinella amoebe

Post by René »

This is one of those crazy things: an amoebe but also able to grow on sunlight. Professionally, very boringly called mixotrophic, but nevertheless intriguing.

ImageImage

It's called Paulinella chromatophora, it has 2 chromophores (duh) called cyanelles because it's not really a chloroplast, and it's not even known whether it is acually an organelle or a symbiontic cyanobacteria. But maybe that's trivial, in any case it is related to Synechococcus, an omnipresent cyanobacterium.

The wall of this amoeboid organism is typically banded with overlapping scales, well visible with an oil immersion lens:

ImageImageImage

Sample derived from a freshwater lake in the north of the Netherlands, size 25um.

Best wishes, René

fpelectronica
Posts: 1808
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: España

Post by fpelectronica »

Interesting
Francisco

René
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:22 am

Post by René »

Thanks Francisco, I forgot to add the top right photo is autofluorescence with a 365nm UV led and longpass barrier (>420nm). Unfortunately I haven't got a specific filterblock for cyanofluorescence (yet), but I am working on that. Images are made on an Oly inverted (IMT2) with 20x/0.7 and 60x/1.4 lenses in a 2ml sedimentation chamber. It seems the critter is rare, an inverted microscope makes it a lot easier to find.

BTW, another Paulinella species I do find regularly in marine samples is Paulinella ovalis. It is a lot smaller and has the same type of lorica with scales.

Image

It was originally described as a chrysophyte flagellate by Wulff (as Calycomonas), it has only recently been redescribed as an amoebe. What appeared to be a flagellum sticking out of the lorica actually was a very thin pseudopodium. I have seen similar thin pseudopodial threads from this Paulinella chromatophora, but they are hard to capture on an image. You can see bits on the first lower image at high mag.

Best wishes, René

BTW, found a wonderful article by Michael Melkonian on the original description by Lauterborn: http://dblab.rutgers.edu/...linella/pdfs/16171191.pdf

Cactusdave
Posts: 1631
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
Location: Bromley, Kent, UK

Post by Cactusdave »

Fine images of an organism I had never heard of. It certainly looks like it could have a symbiotic cyanobacterium inside. You have a very nice setup.
Leitz Ortholux 1, Zeiss standard, Nikon Diaphot inverted, Canon photographic gear

René
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:22 am

Post by René »

Cactusdave wrote:Fine images of an organism I had never heard of. It certainly looks like it could have a symbiotic cyanobacterium inside. You have a very nice setup.
Yep, it's pretty rare, but widespread nonetheless. But the symbiotic relationship, even at 60my old, is not old in evolutionary sense. The specialists are talking about evolution in progress. Watch while it happens, so to say. If you have some spare time, that is...

The Oly setup is not mine personally... certainly as good as it gets. With your Diaphot you should be able to reach the same level :D

Best wishes, Rene

Mitch640
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:43 pm

Post by Mitch640 »

Very nice images. The overlapping scales are particularly interesting.

Cactusdave
Posts: 1631
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
Location: Bromley, Kent, UK

Post by Cactusdave »

Thanks Rene. The Nikon Diaphot is a fine (if rather large :) ) microscope, but mine had been at the tender mercies of just too many graduate students before I acquired it and is a little weary in the mechanics and optics to give of its very best.
Leitz Ortholux 1, Zeiss standard, Nikon Diaphot inverted, Canon photographic gear

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic