Cranefly

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

gpmatthews
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
Contact:

Cranefly

Post by gpmatthews »

Image

Photographed using my Canon Powershot S50 with Wild M8 stereo microscope. 20 image stack combined using Helicon Focus.

This Cranefly has been waiting some time for its portrait to be taken and today I finally got round to it.

Minimal retouching leaving just a little haloing. Lighting was diffuse filament lamp with white paper reflector.
Graham

Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different.

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Abolutely a gorgous shot there Graham, I neve knew a Cranefly could look so good. Excellent work :smt023

Ib Mathiasen
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Ib Mathiasen »

It´s a real beauty :smt023 - and a find work of stakking, with many fin detail.
The light at the body are a littel bit to hard, and details is lost here

But superior a find foto
Ib Mathiasen

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Graham... good results on a tricky (very 3D) subject to stack. I have a question... does the software seem to have any difficulty with the slight "shift" between images that result from using a stereo scope?

gpmatthews
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
Contact:

Post by gpmatthews »

Charlie, no problems with image shift. I've noticed that Helicon seems to take this in its stride, and indeed was quite surprised that I could work almost up to the image edges with little problem. I think it is probably important to ensure that focus shifts by fixed increments, then the software can find the best correction.
Graham

Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different.

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Graham, that's good to hear. It would be great to have the working distance at the magnification range a stereo can provide. I've become so reliant on the stacking software for so many images in that range that it's an important point to consider. (The few non-stereo "macroscopes" I watch for are usually out of my price range)

beetleman
Posts: 3578
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Southern New Hampshire USA

Post by beetleman »

Wonderful photo Graham. I really like the way the head and antennae show off all the detail and the stabilizers are pretty cool also.
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda

Bruce Williams
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Northamptonshire, England
Contact:

Post by Bruce Williams »

Very nice photo Graham - almost certainly a female from the colour, shape and girth of the abdomen.

Hey...and didn't the UK see some craneflies in 2006! Can't remember a year when there were quite so many.

Bruce

svalley
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:07 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon

Post by svalley »

Nice shot Graham. I wonder if you might be able to tone down the hot spot on the thorax with a luminosity mask and a negative curve. It looks like there is still detail there that you could pull out.
"You can't build a time machine without weird optics"
Steve Valley - Albany, Oregon

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic