Osmia bicornis (Male)
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
Nice shots Mike,
I like the first one, nice and sharp and -correct me if I'm wrong- allmost no post processing done, giving it a fresh and natural look.
A lot of CA /purple fringing in the last one ?
I like the first one, nice and sharp and -correct me if I'm wrong- allmost no post processing done, giving it a fresh and natural look.
A lot of CA /purple fringing in the last one ?
Fred
Canonian@Flickr
Canonian@Flickr
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 24055
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Mike, the first one looks pretty good but the others have obvious glitches in the stacking. Examples include halo around the antenna in #2, loss of detail in hairs in #3-5, and halos around the bright areas in #6. Searching the forum, I see you used Helicon a lot in the past. What software was used here, and what method & settings?
--Rik
--Rik
@rjlittlefield
I use Helicon Focus. I always stack with the default settings from Helicon Focus.
The Micrscope that I use
http://www.flechtenmikroskopie.de/index ... =8&lang=en
My Canon EOS 30D stuck in the eyepiece
I use Helicon Focus. I always stack with the default settings from Helicon Focus.
The Micrscope that I use
http://www.flechtenmikroskopie.de/index ... =8&lang=en
My Canon EOS 30D stuck in the eyepiece
Carl Zeiss Standart 14
16x,40x,60x,90x Apochromat
Canon EOS 30D
16x,40x,60x,90x Apochromat
Canon EOS 30D