2 diatoms

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

2 diatoms

Post by Charles Krebs »

The first is a freshwater specimen I photographed a few years back, but just recently came across this file.

The second is from a salt-water sample I just took. It shows two orientations of the same species.

Image

Image

René
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:22 am

Post by René »

Ha, nice one Charlie, the saltwater thingy is Coscinodiscus wailesii, a battleship of a diatom. It's an introduced nuisance species, can form blooms that produce a lot of mucus. When the bloom dies, the breakdown of the mucus takes all oxygen out of the water. Some decades ago it regularly bloomed along the south coast of England, and they were talking about meters (!) of mucal slib on the sea floor.

Rene

Marek Mis
Posts: 2586
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:56 am
Location: Suwalki, Poland
Contact:

Post by Marek Mis »

Charlie,

Beautiful images, amazing details !

Marek

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

René,

Thanks for the identification. Interesting. I've dragged my little plankton net a few times here in Puget Sound (WA) this summer and had always come up with a real mixed "soup" of phytoplankton and zooplankton. In this last sampling, the water was quite "clear" and devoid of the species I had found all summer, but it had a very large number of this (large!) diatom.

It's an introduced nuisance species
Funny, I never thought of concept with diatoms. What was it's "native" geographical location?

René
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:22 am

Post by René »

Hi Charlie,

Nothing more I can add to this:

Distribution
Coscinodicus wailesii has been found throughout the Pacific Ocean since its first description. It is an invasive species in the Atlantic Ocean, first observed in 1977 in the English Channel (Boalch & Harbour 1977), misidentified as Coscinodiscus nobilis, and along the U.S. East coast in the late 1970s. It is absent from a 1964-74 survey of diatoms along the U.S. East coast (Marshall 1976). It appeared in Narragansett Bay in 1978 (Hargraves unpubl.; and found in the Chesapeake Bay in 1980 (Marshall, 1982). The earlier report of the species from Chesapeake Bay (Patten et al. 1963) cannot be confirmed. During the next decade it spread to the South Atlantic, both eastern (Senn 2002) and western (Fernandes et al. 2001; Lutz et al. 2006) sides. It was not present in the Indian Ocean during the 1964-65 R/V ‘Meteor’ expedition according to Simonsen (1974); current status in the Indian Ocean could not be confirmed but it may have also invaded there. Its ability to survive long periods in darkness (Nagai 1995) suggests that transport in ballast water may have aided in its distribution. It is mostly found in coastal and shelf waters, and is apparently absent from boreal and polar environments.

Author(s): Hargraves, Paul
Comment (0)

Mitch640
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:43 pm

Post by Mitch640 »

Beautiful pictures. From the second image, it appears to be a drum shape with a hollow interior.

ABEL
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:30 am

Post by ABEL »

Hello.

Very nice :shock: :shock:

Have you used the obj. of 100X?

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Abel,

As I recall, the first image was taken with the S Plan Apo 100/1.40 using the Zeiss "Ultra-Condenser" (darkfield, oil). That objective has an adjustable aperture to permit darkfield.

The drum shaped diatoms (Coscinodiscus wailesii ... thanks Rene) in the second image are very large diatoms. That was taken in brightfield with a 10X objective (image cropped a fair amount).

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic