Rotifer: Cephalodella forficata (I think!)

Images made through a microscope. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

gpmatthews
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
Contact:

Rotifer: Cephalodella forficata (I think!)

Post by gpmatthews »

Image

Image

Microscope: Zeiss Standard
Ocular: Zeiss KPL-W 10/18
Objective: Leitz 40/0.7 NPL Fluotar ICT
Substage: Leitz 0.9 NA ICT
Sample from Whixall Moss peat bog, Aug 2010
Camera: Canon EOS 500D

A couple of rotifer images from a sample taken from a peat bog on the recent Microscopists' Weekend at Preston Montford.
Graham

Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different.

Mitch640
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:43 pm

Post by Mitch640 »

I'm curious why some parts have color, while others don't. They look like something seen when you split a rock.

gpmatthews
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
Contact:

Post by gpmatthews »

I think the creature is essentially colourless, except for the red eyespot, but that there may be coloured ingested material, maybe also coloured metabolites from digested or part digested food.
Graham

Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different.

verolet
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:52 am
Location: France

Post by verolet »

Hi
if this rotifer has a red eyespot , it can't be C.forficata; but unfortunatly it is impossible to give the right name for this genus if you don't look at the trophus.To many genus look like this one.
Michel

gpmatthews
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
Contact:

Post by gpmatthews »

Unfortunately, far too late to isolate the trophus. Anyway, would be happy with just genus.
Graham

Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic