ZING!

Earlier images, not yet re-categorized. All subject types. Not for new images.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

ZING!

Post by crocoite »

click...click...click...click...click...click...click...click...click...click...

Another UV fluorescent shot - only this time it would send a Geiger off!

The mineral is saleeite from Lake Boga in Victoria. In the hand specimen (second photo), it appears as dull yellow plates a few mm across. But under a UV light source (in this case longwave again) it is an intense luminous green. Whole specimen is 90mm across. I got my wife to hold the specimen for the UV shot, and she was fine until I told her afterwards that it is radioactive :twisted:
Last edited by crocoite on Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

beetleman
Posts: 3578
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Southern New Hampshire USA

Post by beetleman »

Nobody likes the word "radioactive" but their is natural radiation all around us :? When you take these UV shots, are you just taking standard photo shots or do you have to do time Exposures (leave the shutter open for a few seconds)? Very interesting shots Steve....thank your wife for us for her support :smt038
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Interesting photos Steve. Have you been able to measure the amount of radiation emminating from this sample? I would assume it to be extemely low and not dangerous but I am a bit curious. :D

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Post by crocoite »

beetleman wrote:When you take these UV shots, are you just taking standard photo shots or do you have to do time Exposures (leave the shutter open for a few seconds)?
Hi Doug

I had to set the exposure manually (I set it to 5). The auto exposure was saying 1 second but this was far too long.

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Post by crocoite »

Ken Ramos wrote:Interesting photos Steve. Have you been able to measure the amount of radiation emminating from this sample? I would assume it to be extemely low and not dangerous but I am a bit curious. :D
Hi Ken

I'm not aware of what the likely reading would be as I don't have ready access to a Geiger Counter, but it certainly would crackle. These types of mineral specimens are safe enough though. You'd need an awful lot tfor it to be a health hazard - fortunately!

Cyclops
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North East of England
Contact:

Post by Cyclops »

crocoite wrote:

I had to set the exposure manually (I set it to 5). The auto exposure was saying 1 second but this was far too long.
So is that 1/5th of a second?What camera system are you uisng? Doesnt sound like 35mm.

Carl_Constantine
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 am
Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Post by Carl_Constantine »

Looks like kryptonite in the dark ;-)
Carl B. Constantine

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Post by crocoite »

Cyclops wrote: So is that 1/5th of a second?What camera system are you uisng? Doesnt sound like 35mm.
Sony DSC-F828 8 Megapixel Cybershot, and yes 1/5th

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic