
tim
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
You may be amused by this quote from this book I got for Christmas.tpe wrote:if you could catch one red handed so to speak, just to see how the the sperm packet is attached, it looks as if there is nothing that moves, so some kind of sticky hairs or something?
Rainer F. Foelix, in Biology of Spiders wrote:Recently, a freeze-fixation of mating spiders with liquid nitrogen and subsequent serial sectioning of the locked copulatory organs have provided further insights into their function (Huber, 1993, 1994).
[ISBN 978-0-19-509594-4, pg.184]
You know, I don't know who this guy is but I would advise keeping a close eye on and a good distance away from him and Manassas Va.Rainer F. Foelix, in Biology of Spiders wrote:
Recently, a freeze-fixation of mating spiders with liquid nitrogen and subsequent serial sectioning of the locked copulatory organs have provided further insights into their function (Huber, 1993, 1994).
[ISBN 978-0-19-509594-4, pg.184]
My apologies for not passing this along earlier.You didn't specifically ask for an ID, but reading between the lines: it's Hololena nedra, a native species that's a common to abundant house spider in some eastern Washington cities. Same family as Tegenaria, and both have the feathery hairs. The eyes differ strongly between the 2, though. It wasn't all that easy to recognize due to being from an odd angle. These things are so complex that they can look completely different with a little change in angle. The conventional view would be a straight ventral (with the cymbium, the hairy part of the bulb, showing equally on both sides).
The large one shows the wrinkles on the tegulum almost as well as an SEM - must have got the light exactly right.