The Eye has it!
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Mike B in OKlahoma
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:32 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City
The Eye has it!
I was fascinated by this fellow's eye. I had to do minor reconstructive surgery to repair an obnoxious flash reflection, but the eye is still pretty cool.
He is at as precisely 2x as I'll ever get, right at the minimum focus distance for my 180mm with a 2x macro.
Brazilian lancehead, Bothrops moojeni
captive subject
2x
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome
"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome
"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23927
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
- Mike B in OKlahoma
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:32 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City
Here is a quick version with level adjustment done by eyeball (heh). I'd deliberately used a curve on the first version to brighten up the background (because this is almost all flash-lit, the background is pretty dark in the out-of-camera version). I do like the snake better here. I don't like the background as well as the first, but I don't dislike it as much as I expected. If I gave into temptation, I'd regularly post black-background flash-lit subjects, but I try very hard to not do it unless I have a rather special photo I can't get any other way, or else if the subject is at least arguably a night-active creature. So I didn't even examine this version much (I also used levels on the top end for this version, and that was a good idea).rjlittlefield wrote:Wonderful textures in the iris of the eye!
You're giving up a lot of contrast range, though, at least on my display. Photoshop histogram shows essentially nothing below 23 or above 228. Try slapping on a level adjust, say something like (21,1.15,243), and see if you like the result better.
Thanks for making me think about my photo, rather than just semi-blindly processing in the "standard" way.
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome
"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome
"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin