The Eye has it!

Earlier images, not yet re-categorized. All subject types. Not for new images.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Mike B in OKlahoma
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

The Eye has it!

Post by Mike B in OKlahoma »

Image

I was fascinated by this fellow's eye. I had to do minor reconstructive surgery to repair an obnoxious flash reflection, but the eye is still pretty cool.

He is at as precisely 2x as I'll ever get, right at the minimum focus distance for my 180mm with a 2x macro.

Brazilian lancehead, Bothrops moojeni
captive subject
2x
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome

"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Nice clean shot there Mike. No "nosehair" as I can tell. :D

jmlphoto
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:09 am

Post by jmlphoto »

reptile eyes are amazing. great capture 8)

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23927
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Wonderful textures in the iris of the eye! :D

You're giving up a lot of contrast range, though, at least on my display. Photoshop histogram shows essentially nothing below 23 or above 228. Try slapping on a level adjust, say something like (21,1.15,243), and see if you like the result better.

--Rik

Mike B in OKlahoma
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by Mike B in OKlahoma »

rjlittlefield wrote:Wonderful textures in the iris of the eye! :D

You're giving up a lot of contrast range, though, at least on my display. Photoshop histogram shows essentially nothing below 23 or above 228. Try slapping on a level adjust, say something like (21,1.15,243), and see if you like the result better.
Here is a quick version with level adjustment done by eyeball (heh). I'd deliberately used a curve on the first version to brighten up the background (because this is almost all flash-lit, the background is pretty dark in the out-of-camera version). I do like the snake better here. I don't like the background as well as the first, but I don't dislike it as much as I expected. If I gave into temptation, I'd regularly post black-background flash-lit subjects, but I try very hard to not do it unless I have a rather special photo I can't get any other way, or else if the subject is at least arguably a night-active creature. So I didn't even examine this version much (I also used levels on the top end for this version, and that was a good idea).

Thanks for making me think about my photo, rather than just semi-blindly processing in the "standard" way.

Image
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome

"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin

beetleman
Posts: 3578
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Southern New Hampshire USA

Post by beetleman »

Excellent photo mike. I do like the second one better....better contrast for sure. I have Photoshop Elements and I never use it. There is a class coming up at the local High School, will have to look into taking that.
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic