Amazon Pics Part 18

Earlier images, not yet re-categorized. All subject types. Not for new images.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Moebius
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:53 am
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Amazon Pics Part 18

Post by Moebius »

Male and female of same species? Different species? Don't know

Image

What do you get when you cross an armadillo, an elephant, and a jumping spider?

Image

Moth, approximately 6-8 inches across, on the side of a tree trunk. He doesn't look too healthy. Was in a dark area of the forest around dusk. Can put up one with more magnification if desired.

Image

Ken Nelson
Canon 30D
Sigma 150mm
Last edited by Moebius on Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

MacroLuv
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Croatia

Re: Amazon Pics Part 18

Post by MacroLuv »

Very nice! Seems you have enough of those interesting creatures for the whole year posting. :D
Moebius wrote:Moth, approximately 6-8 inches across, on the side of a tree trunk. He doesn't look too healthy.

I think this one deserves Ken's (Administrator) microscope for further investigations. :wink:
The meaning of beauty is in sharing with others.

P.S.
Noticing of my "a" and "the" and other grammar
errors are welcome. :D

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23938
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Wow! Was that moth actually alive? I'd be interested to see much closer view of some of the fungus or whatever it is. Maybe right around the head where you could get a bit of head, wing, leg & antenna all in one crop?

--Rik

Moebius
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:53 am
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Post by Moebius »

MacroLuv,

Yes, at my current rate of displaying 15 pics a week, I should have enough Amazon pics to last us till spring. Hope you don't get tired of them before then.

Rik,

No, this moth was not alive. I will post a cropped shot when I can...later today or tomorrow a.m.

K

Erland R.N.
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Kolding, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Erland R.N. »

I have been away for some time, but just had a look at recent pictures, and I must say your series from the Amazon is very interesting.

Erland

Carl_Constantine
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 am
Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Post by Carl_Constantine »

Moebius wrote:es, at my current rate of displaying 15 pics a week, I should have enough Amazon pics to last us till spring. Hope you don't get tired of them before then.
WOW That's a LOT of pictures. You've got some amazing shots too. Must have been a great trip. Keep'em comin'
Carl B. Constantine

beetleman
Posts: 3578
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Southern New Hampshire USA

Post by beetleman »

More nice pictures Ken...I think Ken Ramos will want a larger picture of the moth for sure. The snout beetle is so cool looking and it is funny how he is hunkered down trying to hide. I will never tire of the pictures :wink:
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda

Moebius
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:53 am
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Post by Moebius »

Here is a link to a cropped picture of the fungus covered moth. Had to use a link so to not go past the daily max.

The feel of the moth is not mushy or slimy at all, but more of a 'crusty' feel.

http://perceptions.smugmug.com/photos/121063990-L.jpg

K

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23938
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Moebius wrote:The feel of the moth is not mushy or slimy at all, but more of a 'crusty' feel.
Interesting -- thanks!!
--Rik

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Re: Amazon Pics Part 18

Post by crocoite »

Hi Ken

I sometimes have this problem - can't see your pictures. I checked the properties and saw that you host them at http://perceptions.smugmug.com

Does your server have routine maintenance times or something?

MacroLuv
Posts: 1964
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Croatia

Post by MacroLuv »

Provided picture link works fine for me.
Maybe something with your browser configuration?
The meaning of beauty is in sharing with others.

P.S.
Noticing of my "a" and "the" and other grammar
errors are welcome. :D

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Post by crocoite »

MacroLuv wrote:Provided picture link works fine for me.
Maybe something with your browser configuration?
No Nikola. It's only Ken's that are a problem, but not all of the time. For instance, I can now see these ones.

Moebius
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:53 am
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Post by Moebius »

hmmm, have only noticed routing maintenance every few months or so, but can see my pics 99% of the time. Not sure what that could be. Are you using IE?

K

crocoite
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:38 am

Post by crocoite »

Moebius wrote:Are you using IE?K
Not unless I have to Ken. I'm a Firefox convert.

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Intersting post here. I am just now catching or trying to catch up on things around the forums. My new interest has been keeping my tied up in research.

That moth definitly exhibit signs of fungal infection and more than likely it is cordyceps. An excellent close up there Ken, couldn't ask for better for an overall view of the moth. Since cordyceps has several different species attuned to different insect species and their anatomy, I wonder just which one this is or if indeed it is a cordyceps species and not some other. The amount of information on Ascomycetes and Deuteromycetes that I have been amassing is quite staggering in relation to their life cycles and methods of reproduction.

The guys were right in assuming I would be interested in this particular moth, infact I was very interested and amazed at what you had captured here. Wish I could have that moth as a part of my "critter" collection. Nothing like having pathogenic spores floating around the home. Thank you very much for this post Ken, work very well done IMO. :wink:

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic